Hello Graham on Tuesday, August 19, 2003 at 10:39:36 you wrote:
>>Hamster.. > I was trying that with extremely poor results with TB beta1 and > beta2. Stefan informed me that it was rather bug ridden. I really hope that he informed the developers of Hamster about "dozens of bugs". Could you ask him about that because it would be fair to tell them about problems and not just being I've been using Hamster with several TB! betas and IMAP4 and I can'T say that I experienced problems. > Seems little point in testing a beta with a known bug ridden server, > so I'm looking for an alternative. If you were right it wouldn't make sense but maybe you/Stefan just used an old beta or made some mistakes in the configuration. Well, I don't want to say that you did make mistakes and Hamster was bug free which is wrong but Hamster has proven to work for many many beta testers with different accounts and clients so it shouldn't be too but ridden. > I confess that OE works quite happily with the IMAP service in > Hamster 2 (not so TB!) In fact, I trust the developers of Hamster more to provide a better implementaion of IMAP4 than Ritlabs because of the less time Rit has already spent on it and the number of knows problems that are discussed on this list and are on Mantis. So it might be the best to use Mercury/32 if its IMAP4 implementation is much older and therefore less bug ridden. -- Regards Daniel The Bat! 2.0 Beta/2, Windows XP Build 2600, Service Pack 1 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.0b2 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
