On Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 2:25:22 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
> I can absolutely guarantee without fear of contradiction that it is
> not a server problem. I have a choice of three clients I can use
> here, two work absolutely flawlessly, one doesn't, all using the
> same server.
You seem immune to pa
--On 6 July 2005 05:48:55 +0200 Manuel Breitfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Okay, I'm sorry. So, let's see what Tony has to say about your suggestion
about "loosing connection" and their corresponding check options.
Fine, if that's what is causing the problem and RL manage to fix it I'll b
--On 5 July 2005 17:10:29 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to help, believe me.
OK then try this... Mulberry.
I don't want to lure you away from TB and I'm not trying to promote
Mulberry but I'd like you to see how easy and effortless reading IMAP mail
is without the nee
Hey Vili,
yesterday (on 07/05/2005 at 23:53) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
>> CONNECTION not of the server. I would add that yes, the fastmail
>> server seems very reliable and works very well here with TB!.
> Dwight is right,
7/5/2005 5:57 PM
Hi Tony,
On 7/5/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TB> --On 5 July 2005 15:32:04 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Next time write something like this:
TB> I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
TB> write to this list?
>> It is REPRODUCIBLE,
Hello Dwight,
>> The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable.
>> To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover,
>> it's the fastest also.
> Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
> CONNECTION not of the server. I would add t
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 4:29:40 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
> The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable.
> To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover,
> it's the fastest also.
Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
C
Hello Vili,
On Tuesday, 05 Juli 2005 at 11:10 PM you (Vili) wrote:
> the IMAP server (which I think is unreliable, as I see so far...)
The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable. To be fair,
it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover, it's the fastest
also.
Hello Tony,
> But I don't know any way to make the above events sound more technical.
> Nine times out of ten the above sequence is **exactly** what happens. Four
> mause clicks, that's all it takes for me to reproduce the above...
> Click 1. Fires up The Bat!
> Click 2. Selects a message I want t
>>> Next time write something like this:
>> I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
>> write to this list?
>>> It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
>>> 1..
>>> 2..
>>> 3..
>>> ..
>>> X.
> I don't want to speak for Vili, but I think the desire is for
> specific
--On 5 July 2005 15:14:39 -0500 Dwight A Corrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.. I loaded up The Bat.
2.. It displayed "No Message Loaded" and
then sat there all day doing nothing.
3.. I closed The Bat down, Loaded up Mulberry and then sat reading
my email within seconds.
is not going t
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:55:53 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
>> Next time write something like this:
> I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
> write to this list?
>> It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
>> 1..
>> 2..
>> 3..
>> ..
>> X.
I don't want to speak for Vili,
Hello Tony,
>> Next time write something like this:
> I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
> write to this list?
Tony, give me a rest :). I am not an Englishman, so if I dont choose
the right words, dont jump on me! It was a SUGGESTION, I dont want to
DIC
--On 5 July 2005 15:32:04 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Next time write something like this:
I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
1..
2..
3..
..
X.
1.. I loaded up The Bat.
2.. It display
Hello Tony,
>> the "It does not work" does not help too much...
> Neither does "Why don't it work" answers from RL. They're the programmers,
> not me, I don't know why it don't work... Or rather I do know why it don't
> work but people wouldn't like it if I said it on here.
Next time write someth
--On 5 July 2005 15:08:00 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the "It does not work" does not help too much...
Neither does "Why don't it work" answers from RL. They're the programmers,
not me, I don't know why it don't work... Or rather I do know why it don't
work but people wouldn't li
Hello Tony,
> --On 5 July 2005 13:39:45 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, try this:
> Yes, it is all very useful info but it's the hoops and gyrations that one
> shouldn't need to go through just to read an email. I may have been to the
> odd circus or two when I was young but the Flyin
--On 5 July 2005 13:39:45 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, try this:
Yes, it is all very useful info but it's the hoops and gyrations that one
shouldn't need to go through just to read an email. I may have been to the
odd circus or two when I was young but the Flying Wilberries I'
--On 5 July 2005 11:41:25 -0500 Michael Acklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I did try Alie's suggestion with adding the commands "Connect to Server"
and "Disconnect to Server" on my menu bar. And that helps with correcting
the number of messages read and unread and deleting them.
But they're
Hello Tony, (and 9Val: the mail contains some reproducible error
descriptions to locate the problem, see below)
>> I have this "No message loaded" screen also. But it is because I am
>> not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
>> problem, too?
> And therein lies the prob
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 11:30:36 AM, (Internet Time - @729) you wrote:
Hello Tony,
TB> And therein lies the problem, mine should be permanently connected or at
TB> least it should connect whenever needed. Mulberry does, Mail 2.0 does, The
TB> bat doesn't. It doesn't seem to be aggressive enough a
--On 5 July 2005 12:17:47 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have this "No message loaded" screen also. But it is because I am
not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
problem, too?
And therein lies the problem, mine should be permanently connected or at
leas
Hello Tony,
I have this "No message loaded" screen also. But it is because I am
not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
problem, too?
I have to admit, that I didnt manage to figure out yet, how this
automatic connecting and disconnecting to the server is working.
On 5 Jul 2005, at 15:35, Mary Bull wrote:
Oh, oh! I'm invited for dinner, when you cook what they find? :)
Couldn't catch them quick enough before they swallowed them. I tried
putting a very tight leather strap around their neck so they couldn't
swallow them but they kept turning blue and
Hello Tony!
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, 8:59 AM, you wrote:
>> Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only "when pigs fly"?
> The speed at which you Americans catch on never ceases to amaze me :)
Oh, I'm unusually quick! lol I did read your meaning immediately, but
I was just lying in wait
--On 5 July 2005 08:11:15 -0500 Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only "when pigs fly"?
The speed at which you Americans catch on never ceases to amaze me :)
And he has!
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know, what a shock! You should see the mess t
Hello Tony!
On Monday, July 04, 2005, 3:29 AM, you wrote:
>> So, wait for a response from 9Val,
> I have enough trouble scraping dead fly's off my windscreen, can you
> imagine the mess a pig would make?
Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only "when pigs fly"?
Get your camera ready t
--On 3 July 2005 14:48:14 -0500 Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, wait for a response from 9Val,
I have enough trouble scraping dead fly's off my windscreen, can you
imagine the mess a pig would make?
--
Tony.
i.
Current b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 3 July 2005 14:39:08 -0500 Mary Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please see Allie's fine comments on dealing with this,
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
And to do that one has to?
- --
Tony.
i.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.
Hello Clive!
On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 2:45 PM, you wrote:
>> Please see Allie's fine comments on dealing with this
> Unfortunately, that doesn't help although we're using the same version and
> same IMAP server (as Tony is).
So, wait for a response from 9Val, when he may (one can hope) come
ba
--On 3/07/2005 14:39 -0500 Mary wrote:
Please see Allie's fine comments on dealing with this
Unfortunately, that doesn't help although we're using the same version and
same IMAP server (as Tony is).
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is 3.5
Hello Tony and Clive, and others interested in IMAP!
On Sunday, July 03, 2005, 1:46 PM, Tony wrote:
> Tried 36 and very first message... "No Message Loaded". Went for a bath,
> made a cup of tea, cooked spaghetti bolognese, cut the grass, washed and
> polished the car, repointed the chimney stack
32 matches
Mail list logo
