6/25/2005 6:56 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AM>> IMO, you shouldn't be using IMAP.
AS> I have to, for these reasons:
AS> - I want seperate folders with the ability of server-side filtering by
AS> my provider.
AS> - I want to be able to use both a mail client and my provide
Hi Allie,
AM> Interesting what you do there. Isn't the laptop connectable to the
AM> Internet? Why don't you connect to the server and do the
AM> synchronisation?
Of course it is. But until a week ago I was using ISDN dial-up and had
no intention of transfering the same data twice. Now though I'
Hello Allie,
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 at 09:38 you reply to Alto:
> On Friday, June 24, 2005, at 09:16 AM, Alto Speckhardt
> wrote:
>> Copying the cache files from my home machine onto the laptop via
>> "Windows Offline Folder".
> Interesting what you do there. Isn't the laptop connectable to the
>
On Friday, June 24, 2005, at 09:16 AM, Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
> Copying the cache files from my home machine onto the laptop via
> "Windows Offline Folder". This is usually done by WLAN and thus not
> very fast, therefore I have considerable interest in keeping the
> files as small as possible.
I
Hi Allie,
>> For one, I may not even notice that I erase the cache. For example, I
>> often want to compress the files of my local mailbase to save time
>> when synchronizing with my laptop.
AM> How will that save time? What synchronizing are you referring to?
Copying the cache files from my hom
On Friday, June 24, 2005 at 6:36:05 AM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
> You're right, I did misunderstand. When you spoke of the message list,
> I understood "messages". My apologies.
Not a problem. :)
> For one, I may not even notice that I erase the cache. For example, I
> often want to c
Hi Allie,
AM> I was referring to the message list and TB!. For you to read a single
AM> message in an IMAP mailbox using TB!, TB! has to first propagate and
AM> cache the full message list locally. That's not too unusual BTW.
AM> ThunderBird does the same thing.
You're right, I did misunderstand.
On Friday, June 24, 2005 at 5:30:12 AM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
> Allie reported in a recent message that one problem of TheBat/IMAP vs.
> other programs like Mulberry is that TheBat is always caching a
> message locally before displaying it, which other programs do not.
I did not say
Hi all,
since RIT stated that they were working on the basics of IMAP
implementation I wish to inject one thought:
Allie reported in a recent message that one problem of TheBat/IMAP vs.
other programs like Mulberry is that TheBat is always caching a
message locally before displaying it, which oth
9 matches
Mail list logo
