1/25/2006 8:41 AM
Hi Alto,
On 1/25/2006 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS> There has been no violation of list policy discernible to me.
Discernment is preceded by recognition and acknowledgement. It takes a
lot longer to clear the air than it does to blow smoke.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.65.
Hi,
RO> What part of
RO> ,-
RO> | This topic has become far too heated and I am forced to pronounce it
RO> | dead.
RO> `-
RO> was too difficult to understand?
Excuse me very much, but apparently any part of my message (I don't
know how to insert a reference; I'm refering to my message of
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 6:12:57 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> which of your problems have been confirmed by others? because I can't
DAC> confirm any of the ones listed today.
Hi Dwight:
Please see this thread:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and also see the BT report:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view
Hello Jon,
> Stefan reports this as fixed - I assure you (and Stefan) that it is
> not. The problem can reliably be reproduced on my end. I use POP so
> IMAP is not the problem.
full confirmed, still the same slow redraw problem here.
POP3 only - WinXP P4/2.4Mhz 1GB-RAM /MatroxG550
--
Best reg
Hallo Alto,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:05:11 +0100GMT (24-1-2006, 19:05 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AS> Any due respect nonwithholding,
What part of
,-
| This topic has become far too heated and I am forced to pronounce it
| dead.
`-
was too difficult to understand?
I'm seeing a thre
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 2:18:48 PM, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
> Done. Now I'm berating again.
which of your problems have been confirmed by others? because I can't
confirm any of the ones listed today.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorri
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 3:03:02 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
PVN> I run Voyager on a PIII 750 w/ 1 gig RAM and the flash drive connected
PVN> to a USB 1.1 port (motherboard is too old for USB 2) and experience
PVN> nothing like you describe. May I suggest you carefully examine your
PVN> facilit
1/24/2006 3:47 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/24/2006 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> Just for balance, I run voyager via a USB 2 port and on shutting down
ND> the USB drive light remains on for nearly five minutes before TB
ND> completely unloads.
This a valid comparison between you and me except that you are using
1/24/2006 3:47 PM
Hi Nick,
On 1/24/2006 Nick Danger wrote:
ND> Just for balance, I run voyager via a USB 2 port and on shutting down
ND> the USB drive light remains on for nearly five minutes before TB
ND> completely unloads.
This a valid comparison between you and me except that you are using
Guten Morgen,
PVN> May I suggest you carefully examine your facilities and fix what
PVN> is wrong before berating RIT for your local problems.
Done. Now I'm berating again.
--
MfG,
Alto
pgpgOjAktySli.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Cur
Reply to message sent 01/24/2006, @ 15:03:02 (2:03 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Paul,
> I run Voyager on a PIII 750 w/ 1 gig RAM and the flash drive connected
> to a USB 1.1 port (motherboard is too old for USB 2) and experience
> nothing like
1/24/2006 2:56 PM
Hi Alto,
On 1/24/2006 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS> Ok. I'm experiencing very different times. On my laptop that is
AS> connected via WLAN (11 MBit)it usually takes well above five minutes.
AS> If I try shutdown Windows the "not responding" window is coming up. I
AS> usually igno
Guten Morgen,
>> Starting TheBat here takes about 20 seconds. That I can live with.
M> With the /nologo option here it is at most 5 seconds.
Maybe the difference can be attributed to the fact that my mailbase
resides on a network drive. Whatever, that really isn't my problem.
>> Closing TheBat
Hello Alto,
> Then we obviously have some difference in our systems that's worth
> tracking down:
>
> Starting TheBat here takes about 20 seconds. That I can live with.
With the /nologo option here it is at most 5 seconds.
> Closing TheBat only apears to be almost instantanious, the thebat.exe
>
Hi,
>> c.) the startup and exit times of TheBat have, if anything, further
>> degraded with this beta version.
M> Not here, Alto. Not at all.
Then we obviously have some difference in our systems that's worth
tracking down:
Starting TheBat here takes about 20 seconds. That I can live with.
Clos
Hello Alto,
> c.) the startup and exit times of TheBat have, if anything, further
> degraded with this beta version.
Not here, Alto. Not at all.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.70.02 Qigong(Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
_
Hi,
AS>> There was a beta version released and I reported bugs in it.
RO> Actually you reported that a discontinued feature was discontinued for
RO> the umptieth time. Please consider that topic dead horsed. The rest of
RO> the thread with with the above mentioned subject can continue.
Any due re
Hallo Alto,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:46:58 +0100GMT (24-1-2006, 17:46 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AS> There was a beta version released and I reported bugs in it.
Actually you reported that a discontinued feature was discontinued for
the umptieth time. Please consider that topic dead horsed.
18 matches
Mail list logo
