Re: NFS: Wrapping up on " Big question for 9Val" thread

2004-09-08 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 18:06, 9Val wrote: M>> With or without modifications done by a previous filter? > With modifications - remember, object is the same Now I think it is even more important to not let the NFS move a parked message, whether it is originally parked or parked by the f

Re: NFS: Wrapping up on " Big question for 9Val" thread

2004-09-09 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello MAU, On Thursday, September 9, 2004 at 4:37:13 PM you [M] wrote (at least in part): M>>> 4.- Actions possible before and after a Move. >> >> Agreed to the "compromise", as this is what I'd call "the natural way" :-) M> Yes, but "the natural way" should be clearly explained to the users ju

Re: NFS: Wrapping up on " Big question for 9Val" thread

2004-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, > Or even shorter: > > "Don't care for where the message is, just deal with it. A 'copy' > action does not create a new handle to deal with, but only a duplicate > manifestation of the message with all it's states. A 'delete' > action disables you to do anything with this message fro

Re: NFS: Wrapping up on " Big question for 9Val" thread

2004-09-09 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, > I know. But I'd like to see NFS flawlessly and proven reliable before > NNFS gets into it's first Alpha state :-) Me too :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 Current beta i

Re: NFS: Wrapping up on " Big question for 9Val" thread

2004-09-10 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello MAU, On Thursday, September 9, 2004 at 11:58:37 PM you [M] wrote (at least in part): [very short NFS description] M> Hey! You look like a good candidate to write TB's HELP. ;-) Hey, you look like you want the shortest help ever seen being delivered ;-) I fear the help would end up quite to