OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-01 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Tony, Tony Boom wrote (in ): > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Win32) No, please not. Please not again!!! -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de _

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-01 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Boris. --On 01 June 2005 21:25 +0200 you wrote about OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm): > No, please not. Please not again!!! Sorry, explained the reason, can't do anything about it. If From: = Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Then Move to Trash. Easy.

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-01 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Tony, Tony Boom wrote (in ): >> No, please not. Please not again!!! > Sorry, explained the reason, can't do anything about it. > If From: = Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Then Move to Trash. Ok, good bye :-). -- Regards, Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de ___

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-01 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Boris. --On 01 June 2005 22:55 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm): > Ok, good bye :-). Yes, tatar. Not that your reading this :) -- Tony. M. pgpE0k6wtWrrS.pgp Description: PGP signat

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-01 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:48:17 +0100, Tony Boom wrote: >>No, please not. Please not again!!! >Sorry, explained the reason, can't do anything about it. Indeed. Mulberry's Message-ID's are syntactically correct. The problem is TB! doesn't recognize them as such. So it's Ro^Hitlabs that should do som

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-02 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Arjan. --On 02 June 2005 02:54 +0200 you wrote about Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm): > So it's > Ro^Hitlabs that should do something about it. No, it isn't, it's my IMAP server that's causing the trouble, it has nothing to do with The Bat or

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-02 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:59:11 +0100, Tony Boom wrote: >> So it's Ro^Hitlabs that should do something about it. > No, it isn't, it's my IMAP server that's causing the trouble, > it has nothing to do with The Bat or Mulberry. I'll have to get > onto them about it again see what they're doing about i

Re: OT: Broken References (WAS: Re: [OT] Sarcasm)

2005-06-03 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Arjan, On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:54:59 +0200 GMT (02/06/2005, 07:54 +0700 GMT), Arjan de Groot wrote: AdG> Indeed. Mulberry's Message-ID's are syntactically correct. AdG> The problem is TB! doesn't recognize them as such. So it's AdG> Ro^Hitlabs that should do something about it. It's his ISP,