Re: On Alphas

Hello Maxim, Sunday, June 25, 2017, 8:46:13 AM, you wrote: > Hello Tony, > Friday, June 23, 2017, 6:56:38 PM, you wrote: >> Can I just ask a simple question, please? >> Why have the recent releases been classed as ALPHAs and not BETAs? >> Are they expected by R

Recent Alphas Unsusable

be lines of text in the body as the spell checker’s squiggly lines show up. I will further test with future alphas and betas but, not least due to the problems TB gives me with IMAP accounts, change my production e-mail client to Outlook. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] +49 179 6 63 65

On Alphas

Hello Tony, Friday, June 23, 2017, 6:56:38 PM, you wrote: > Can I just ask a simple question, please? > Why have the recent releases been classed as ALPHAs and not BETAs? > Are they expected by RITlabs to be less stable? Thank you for the good question! We are using the

Are the v5 alphas private ?

Hello, I keep seeing messages about v5 alpha builds but the links are always down. Is alpha private and if yes could you please move the discussions about it off-list in order not to confuse us about what's private and what's public ? -- That is not dead which can eternal lie, yet with strange

Re: Are the v5 alphas private ?

Hello all, Friday, June 25, 2010, George Μ. Menegakis wrote: I keep seeing messages about v5 alpha builds but the links are always down. yes, they are private yet because early alpha stage Is alpha private and if yes could you please move the discussions about it off-list in order not to

Help, getting in a right mess with the new alphas!

. But as soon as i tried to update the new install with my back up it was back to the AV's. OK, they are all alphas and hopefully a release version WILL work, but now i have found a most irritating bug that Ritlabs fixed a while back is here to haunt me again. I am finding that if i am reading an unread