Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-05-01 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Charlene, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 11:33:24 PM, you wrote: > Hi Vilius Šumskas, > Sunday, April 30, 2006 > you let us know -possibly edited- : >> The Bat! don't have source open. So we must not trust them then right? > TB isn't a privacy enhancement company ;) Ok, we should not trust TB'

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Google Mail
Hello Jernej, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 12:57:05 PM, you wrote: > Doesn't matter - never trust a privacy enhancement program that doesn't > have it's source open. PGP 9.x has always had it's source code open for others to scrutinize. With respect to PGP & TB, I too would like RitLabs to work on be

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Sebastian Murawski
Hello TheBat Beta List Members!!! Someday, and that was in Sunday evening, Peter wrote something like this: > I suggest to use previous PGP versions, or, even better, GnuPG from > www.gnupg.org. GnuPG not support eToken and iKey. :( BTW is in TB implemented support for Certificate Revoca

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Vilius Šumskas, Sunday, April 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : > The Bat! don't have source open. So we must not trust them then right? TB isn't a privacy enhancement company ;) -- kind regards Charlene Ferrara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.80.03 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Jernej, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 10:57:05 PM, you wrote: > On Sunday, April 30, 2006, 21:40:23, Vilius Šumskas wrote: >>> As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it >>> depends on them to provide means of access to other software >>> developers. (Someone correct me

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Sunday, April 30, 2006, 21:40:23, Vilius Šumskas wrote: >> As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it >> depends on them to provide means of access to other software >> developers. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) > They have a public open SDK. Doesn't matter - never

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Peter, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 8:18:14 PM, you wrote: > As far as I understand, PGP 9 is proprietary code of pgp.com, so it > depends on them to provide means of access to other software > developers. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.) They have a public open SDK. -- Best regards, Vili

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Per, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:02:17 +0200GMT (30.04.2006, 09:02 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PMK> When will TheBat be modified so that integrates well with PGP 9 PMK> (able to use buttons to decryp/encrypt etc.) As far as I understand, PGP 9

PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-04-30 Thread Per Michael Knudsen
Hello tbbeta, When will TheBat be modified so that integrates well with PGP 9 (able to use buttons to decryp/encrypt etc.) -- Best regards, Per mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Samspilssituationer, involverende spæde el