Title: Re: Sorting and first message
jueves, 22 feb. 2018 at 23:40, it seems you wrote:
Dears, we would like to know how often you missclick on first message in list and instead of it you clicked on header and as result the sorting become broken and you have to restore initial sorting.
In
Title: Re: Sorting and first message
Hello Lüko,
Or leave it as it is. It is just one click to restore the original sorting.
+1
> Don't make it too complicated
+1
> And there are more important issues to resolve than an extra step to restore the preferred sorting of t
Guten Tag Ira,
am Samstag, 24. Februar 2018 um 00:47 schrieb Ira :
> Friday, February 23, 2018, 1:05:05 PM, Peter Hampf wrote:
>> IMO an empty line is waste of space. I'd like to see variant
>> 2. Better than a non-standard-compliant solution such as an extra inquiry.
> Yes, I would agree with
Hello Peter,
Friday, February 23, 2018, 1:05:05 PM, you wrote:
> IMO an empty line is waste of space. I'd like to see variant
> 2. Better than a non-standard-compliant solution such as an extra inquiry.
Yes, I would agree with this method being preferred.
-- Ira
__
Hello Andrei,
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, at 00:40:44 [GMT +0200] (which was 23:40 where I
live) andrei.sliusarenco wrote:
> Dears, we would like to know how often you missclick on first
> message in list and instead of it you clicked on header and as
> result the sorting become broken and you have to r
Title: Re: Sorting and first message
Hello andrei.sliusarenco,
Dears, we would like to know how often you missclick on first message in list and instead of it you clicked on header and as result the sorting become broken and you have to restore initial sorting.
Maybe half a dozen times
6 matches
Mail list logo
