Re[2]: 3.5.36

Hello Peter, Friday, July 01, 2005, 14:21:06, you wrote: >>Say what? What is this? There are users who can connect to Exchange only from Outlook, while The Bat! reports erorr loging to Exchange server. In this case, you can go to Account menu of The Bat!, click "Properties" and choose the profi

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Bill, > Thanks for the latest beta. Here are a few > observations: > (1) Under the Main menu, Specials has Watch Replies In > as blank again. Not confirmed. It does seem that I am not getting that annoying "Could not compose message for uploading message" now. Sometimes fixes sneak in wh

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Hello Mary, >> Actually I am using v26, that works. > Typo, here for v.36? I am certain it is. No. I put back v26 as it works with Exchange... -- Vili Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Friday, July 1, 2005, 3:21:50 PM, (Internet Time - @890) you wrote: Hello Zygmunt, ZW> On Friday, July 1, 2005, at 15:29:49 [UTC-0400] (Friday, July 1, 2005 21:29 ZW> my local time) Vili wrote: >> Actually I am using v26, that works. Please send me direct link to >> v27-31 (I cannot log

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Hi, In reply to : CT> --On 3/07/2005 19:46 +0100 Tony wrote: >> Went for a bath, made a cup of tea, etc etc CT> Me too, except I grew a beard as well. I wonder if everybody considers this new beta as a major improvement over the previous beta and the current official

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Hello Bill, > (2) Refreshing a virtual Watched folder causes the Sent > Mail folder to be checked. This may be WAD but it > is annoying. If you mean chat folder (or watch replies) - it is WAD Simple virtual folder shouldn't have such behaviour --

Re[2]: 3.5.36

Hello Tony, > Allie explained to me the way TB's IMAP works compared to other IMAP > clients and it seems to me it works the complete opposite to > everything else. I'm not a programmer but that seems a bit suss to > me. The word you were looking for is: invention :) So, if it is di

Re[2]: 3.5.36

On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Tony Boom wrote: > Mulberry collects headers and displays email instantly here without > *any* noticeable delays. The Bat doesn't display them at all here, > all I get is no message loaded for hours at a time. I'd say that was > pretty much the complete op

Re: Re[2]: 3.5.36

--On 3/07/2005 20:50 +0100 Goncalo wrote: I didn't saw any major complaint though IMAP and EXCHANGE support are still broken. Isn't that enough to complain about? -- Clive Taylor Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information: htt

Re: Re[2]: 3.5.36

--On 5 July 2005 10:09:00 -0400 Vili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The word you were looking for is: invention :) So, if it is different, it can be good or bad... I've read and reread what I wrote and nowhere can I substitute any word I wrote for the word "invention" so you've either lost

Re: Re[2]: 3.5.36

On 5 Jul 2005, at 16:54, Allie Martin wrote: Ah. I mistook you for being serious. My apologies. I was being serious. You told me TB caches all it's IMAP mail and needs the cache constantly clearing whereas Berry and Mail for example don't use a cache. Or words to that effect? -- Tony.