Re[2]: IMAP - Test Please reply

2006-02-06 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Roelof, A reminder of what Roelof Otten typed on: Monday, February 06, 2006 at 18:49:56 GMT +0100 BT>> Could someone reply for testing purposes. TIA. RO> That would be somewhat more sympathetic when you'd use your real name. Sorry it is just me doing more IMAP testing. I have now se

Re[2]: IMAP - Test Please reply

2006-02-06 Thread Bat Tester
Hello Roelof, Monday, February 6, 2006, 12:24:57 PM, you wrote: > Statistics. > No self respecting Canadian would have Bat as first name. Maybe some > native American would be using a name as 'Bat hunted by bugs', but > 'Bat Tester'? No way. Well I was considering having it officially changed, b

Re[2]: IMAP - Test Please reply

2006-02-06 Thread Bat Tester
Hello Cees, Monday, February 6, 2006, 12:52:25 PM, you wrote: > it's a matter of manners > I'm Rubeo, but I still have my real (first) name in my sig. Just hadn't got that far yet. Done now. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re[2]: IMAP - Test Please reply

2006-02-06 Thread Bat Tester
Hello Mary, Monday, February 6, 2006, 1:05:58 PM, you wrote: > Pleased to see you. But as you might note, I took you on faith. The > post had good vibes. ;) It's obvious you can tell a fellow beta tester from a mile away. :) -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re[2]: IMAP - Test Please reply

2006-02-06 Thread Bat Tester
Hello Mary, Monday, February 6, 2006, 1:14:58 PM, you wrote: > So now could you get your x-rogue sending-capability functioning, too? > Pretty please? Hopefully this works, its been a while. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.07 "Q