Re: Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-06 Thread Tony Boom
--On 5 July 2005 17:10:29 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to help, believe me. OK then try this... Mulberry. I don't want to lure you away from TB and I'm not trying to promote Mulberry but I'd like you to see how easy and effortless reading IMAP mail is without the need

Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Vili
Hello Tony, I have this No message loaded screen also. But it is because I am not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your problem, too? I have to admit, that I didnt manage to figure out yet, how this automatic connecting and disconnecting to the server is

Re: Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Tony Boom
--On 5 July 2005 12:17:47 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have this No message loaded screen also. But it is because I am not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your problem, too? And therein lies the problem, mine should be permanently connected or at least

Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Vili
Next time write something like this: I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't write to this list? It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this: 1.. 2.. 3.. .. X. I don't want to speak for Vili, but I think the desire is for specific enough information that

Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Vili
Hello Tony, But I don't know any way to make the above events sound more technical. Nine times out of ten the above sequence is **exactly** what happens. Four mause clicks, that's all it takes for me to reproduce the above... Click 1. Fires up The Bat! Click 2. Selects a message I want to

Re[2]: IMAP No Message Loaded [was Re: 3.5.36]

2005-07-05 Thread Vili
Hello Dwight, The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable. To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover, it's the fastest also. Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the CONNECTION not of the server. I would add that