Hello Stefan,

Wednesday, August 6, 2003, 7:12:43 PM, you wrote:

ST> This is actually planned. Technically, there is no problem to use
ST> multiple connections, but it would increate the Beta testing period
ST> which is already extremely long :-)

Seeing how close to unusable it is for now, I wouldn't mind any longuer
beta period. As 2.0 is only at Beta/1, is it important anyway ? :)

ST> Actually, some tasks are performed in parallel (like getting message
ST> count) and many tasks may change the current mailbox or cause
ST> "racing", therefore queuing is preferred.

Yes but there are many occasions where I see starvation and queuing then
means "no-reaction" as long as longuer running tasks don't complete.

ST> However, the option to use multiple IMAP connections is added to the
ST> (new) fine-tune dialogue, but it will stay invisible until the next
ST> Beta-series.

Great.
Maybe you are right, maybe the current queuing is a good solution, but
on my IMAP account that doesn't look like good enough. I have been using
IMAP clients for years. My account is quite complex and heavy, a bit
less than 100 folders in a hierarchy. Most folders have a small number
of messages (between 50 and 500). Some (but rarely used - archives) have
in the order of 2000 to 5000 messages.
I'm LAN connected to my IMAP server but polling ALL folders just for
counts takes more than a minute.

What would you recommend as synchronisation settings ?
I have only a few folders where incoming mails are placed by the IMAP
server (sorting rules on the server side). So I would like TB *not* to
check *each* folder count everytime. It actually only has to monitor 5
or 6 folders for potential new messages. Any new message in another
folder would only occur because of a move (which I would have done with
TB filters or manually).

For now, I have set *all* folders to NO synchonization except those that
really receive new messages unattended : I set those to "Headers only".

I often has the case where on entering a folder I see new messages, but
when I click on them they don't display. Each time I see this, the
connection centre shows NO connection or a connection apparently hanged
on "Retrieving status of mailbox "x y or z".

I'll try to continue TB 2.0 Beta/1 tomorrow in my day work to better
test it, but for now, the behaviour makes it very uneasy to reliably
check mails.

Thanks !

-- 
Best regards,
Olivier Mascia
The Bat! v2.0 Beta/1 (Only IMAP accounts)
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 2.0b1 | "Using TBBETA" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to