Re: Re[6]: 3.5.36

2005-07-04 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 4/07/2005 21:30 +0100 Goncalo wrote: I'm saying the b36 is better than b30 though still having annoying bugs. I'm not so concerned about unresolved minor bugs (although others may not agree) but in the programme's core performance with IMAP. It still does not work satisfactorily enough

Re: Re[6]: 3.5.36

2005-07-04 Thread Clive Taylor
--On 4/07/2005 21:33 +0100 Goncalo wrote: You must agree that it has improved over B30, right? I see no improvements whatsoever in IMAP performance over 3.5.30's performance. It is still unusable day-to-day for all the reasons discussed in this group. -- Clive Taylor __

Re[6]: 3.5.36

2005-07-04 Thread Goncalo Farias
Tony, In reply to : TB> --On 4 July 2005 07:22:30 +0100 Goncalo Farias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TB> wrote: >> At least this seems more stable and bug free. TB> I'll have one of whatever you've been drinking. Post the address. You must agree that it has improved over B30, rig

Re[6]: 3.5.36

2005-07-04 Thread Goncalo Farias
In reply to : CT> --On 4/07/2005 07:22 +0100 Goncalo wrote: >> I don't think so because b30, which is the official release, has those >> problems too CT> So you are saying that since a feature is broken in a previous CT> version and not rectified in a newer one, then

Re[6]: 3.5.36

2005-07-01 Thread Eugene Gladchenko
Vili, >> If you've selected a profile created by The Bat!, which looks >> like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", it will work as before. Please delete >> this profile in the control panel. Within The Bat! please select a >> profile created by Outlook. V> Where do I exactly find the profile in Control panel? S