In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>> Don't say it wrong because it not! It seems that you didn't understand >> what I meant. I> Hey, its wrong to _me_. So of course I can say its wrong. But it's not. I>>> functionality of the 'attachment display' has nothing to do with I>>> 'randomnesss' since the population of that [attachments] list is not I>>> random i.e. it displays attachments, not random bits of data objects I>>> pulled from elsewhere (as in random). Do you read everything I write? I'll try again! Imagine that you receive an email with the following attachments: winter.jpg, autumn.jpg, summer.jpg and spring.jpg If you want, with the pane mode, you may select any random set of the above list of attachments and delete it (ie: (winter, autumn), (summer, sprint, winter), (winter, summer) you name it). To be coherent with your arguments, the button view should mimic the possibility to select any arbitrary set of files from the attachment list for deletion. >> What I meant was that, if you have files 1, 2, 3 and 4 you are able to >> select 1 and 3, 2 and 4, 2 and 3, 1,2 and 4, etc and then delete those >> files. >> So, you can select a random SET of the AVAILABLE attachments for >> deletion (and actually delete them) and that's not possible with the >> "button" view. I> Now you're confusing the issue. There is no call of obfuscation. No, I'm not. I> We're not talkin about randomness of attachments. We're tallking I> about two views, holding the same information, but one not allowing I> the flexibility as the other. That's exactly what I'm pointing out. There are some things that you can do with the pane view that are not possible with the button view! Period! -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Do not adjust your mind, the fault is with reality. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
