Re: SOT: Changing spelling rules (was: Spell checker)

2008-02-02 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, February 2, 2008, 7:53:21 PM, Rick Grunwald wrote: > Can we restore the pre-1917 RUssian alphabet while we're at it? :) and the calendar -- Dwight A. Corrin 1201 W River Blvd Apt B108 Wichita KS 67203 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat!

Re: SOT: Changing spelling rules (was: Spell checker)

2008-02-02 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, February 2, 2008, 7:47:56 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > neighbour versus neighbor I was going to suggest that after the US elections, that former PM, the former President, someone from Australia and someone from South Africa get together, then I guess we'd need someone from Canada an

Re: SOT: Changing spelling rules (was: Spell checker)

2008-02-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Rick, On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:53:21 -0500 GMT (03/02/2008, 08:53 +0700 GMT), Rick Grunwald wrote: RG> Can we restore the pre-1917 RUssian alphabet while we're at it? :) No, but you can spell-check it if you find the encoding, a font, and the corresponding .tlx file. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: SOT: Changing spelling rules (was: Spell checker)

2008-02-02 Thread Rick Grunwald
> Hello Dwight, > On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:27:05 -0600 GMT (03/02/2008, 02:27 +0700 GMT), > Dwight Corrin wrote: DC>> Are you serious. Did they take a language and decide to implement DC>> a new set of spellings? > Why not? > Lincoln did that in USA (valid only for USA). "Tonight" became > "tonite

SOT: Changing spelling rules (was: Spell checker)

2008-02-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Dwight, On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:27:05 -0600 GMT (03/02/2008, 02:27 +0700 GMT), Dwight Corrin wrote: DC> Are you serious. Did they take a language and decide to implement DC> a new set of spellings? Why not? Lincoln did that in USA (valid only for USA). "Tonight" became "tonite". OK, that on