Re: Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-17 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez, am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 um 17:19 schrieben Sie: > I'm looking forward to my next trip to Madrid. You know what you'll > have to show me. ;-) I did not reach Madrid and was in "La Jonquera" as i already reached the boarder to see the Stars :-) ...some time ago.

Re: Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:03:57 +0100 GMT (17/02/2008, 23:03 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: M>>> Have you been drinking again that horrible beer that makes you blind? >> >> Is there any other kind? ;-) M> Of course my friend! Most other beers enhance your vision. After a few M> you will see _dou

Re: Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-17 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, M>> Have you been drinking again that horrible beer that makes you blind? > > Is there any other kind? ;-) Of course my friend! Most other beers enhance your vision. After a few you will see _double_ (or even in 'stereo') and, if you have enough, you will see stars orbiting about yo

Re: Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-17 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:08:06 +0100 GMT (17/02/2008, 20:08 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: >> 4.0.14 was a release version? I must have missed that. M> Have you been drinking again that horrible beer that makes you blind? Is there any other kind? ;-) M> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/theb

Re: Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-17 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, > 4.0.14 was a release version? I must have missed that. Have you been drinking again that horrible beer that makes you blind? http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.14.2 on Windows XP 5.1

Release versions, beta versions, and update checker (was: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4))

2008-02-16 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello MAU, On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:49:54 +0100 GMT (17/02/2008, 04:49 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: M> The first time the new dlls were 'released' was within the .rar file of M> one of the Alphas (4.0.0.9?) and later with the msi files of RC. The M> first _release_ version to was 4.0.14. 4.0.14 was a

Re: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-16 Thread MAU
Hello Ian, M>> Going back and installing v3.99.29 MSI was a good idea but then, M>> "jumping" directly to v4.0.14.2 without any 4.x MSI install in between M>> perhaps not, because you will be missing some updated dlls. > > Which is the first release version with the new spell check system as > t

Re: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-16 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, M>> Going back and installing v3.99.29 MSI was a good idea but then, M>> "jumping" directly to v4.0.14.2 without any 4.x MSI install in M>> between perhaps not, because you will be missing some updated dlls. > > I did reinstall SSCE5532.dll and hunspell.dll. I don't kn

Re: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-16 Thread Mike
On Saturday, February 16, 2008, 5:22:41 AM, MAU wrote: M> Going back and installing v3.99.29 MSI was a good idea but then, M> "jumping" directly to v4.0.14.2 without any 4.x MSI install in M> between perhaps not, because you will be missing some updated dlls. I did reinstall SSCE5

Re: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-16 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, > So, I tried reinstalling The Bat! v3.99.29 MSI and UnRARed 4.2v4.0.1 > over it. Going back and installing v3.99.29 MSI was a good idea but then, "jumping" directly to v4.0.14.2 without any 4.x MSI install in between perhaps not, because you will be missing some updated dlls. --

Re: Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-15 Thread Mike
On Friday, February 15, 2008, 6:01:49 AM, MAU wrote: M> You will have to give a little more detail about what "I haven't M> been able to get spell checking to work at all" really means. Neither SSCE nor Hunspell were working. Nothing was being marked as misspelt. So, I tried reinstal

Spell check NO GO (was: Re: 4.0.14.4)

2008-02-15 Thread MAU
Hello Mike, > I must be doing something wrong then. I haven't been able to get spell > checking to work at all. I've tried almost every suggestion I've seen > here and nothing has helped. You will have to give a little more detail about what "I haven't been able to get spell checking to work at a