Broken?
--
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! Natural Email System 4.1.14.1 (RC1) on Microsoft® Windows Vista™
Home Premium Versie 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001 64 bit
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz, 2333 MHz,4 co
Hi all,
I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.61.07 Echo :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195,
Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002
Hi Henk,
on Friday, May 22, 2009, at 19:36:45[GMT +0200](which was 19:36 where
I live) you wrote among others:
> Broken?
> Broken?
gpg: Unterschrift vom 05/22/09 19:36:40 mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID B464DD0F
gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von "Henk M. de Bruijn"
gpg: alias "Henk M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Henk,
on Fri, 22 May 2009 19:36:45 +0200GMT (22.05.2009, 19:36 +0200GMT
here),
you wrote:
HMdB> Broken?
Good here too.
,-
| gpg: Unterschrift vom 05/22/09 19:36:40 mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID
B464DD0F
| gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von "Hen
On Fri, 22 May 2009, at 21:52:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:52 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
> on Fri, 22 May 2009 19:36:45 +0200GMT (22.05.2009, 19:36 +0200GMT
> here),
> you wrote:
HMdB>> Broken?
> Good here too.
Thanks guys!
My wanadoo e-mailaddresses have been revoked. You can refresh m
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 26, 2005, 11:48 AM, you wrote:
> I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
> 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says "Valid
Mary Bull schrieb:
> Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says "Valid key."
Thank you for signing my key locally. :-)
> (I'm using 6.5.8ckt09b2.)
That's a flaw in the last beta from Imad - he forgot to change the
"About" data. I'm sure, you're using 09b3 too. ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
Thunderbird ve
Hello Peter!
On Monday, September 26, 2005, 1:00 PM, you wrote:
>> Good signature here, Peter. PGPlog says "Valid key."
> Thank you for signing my key locally. :-)
I trust you. :)
>> (I'm using 6.5.8ckt09b2.)
> That's a flaw in the last beta from Imad - he forgot to change the
> "About" data.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, at 18:48:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:48 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
> I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
> 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Good signature fr
Hallo Peter,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:48:07 +0200GMT (26-9-2005, 18:48 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PM> I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
PM> 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
Checks out fine with PGP 8.1
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Peter Meyns wrote:
> I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
> 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171)
Thank you all for your replies. At least, now I know one way to use
PGP/MIME with The Bat! if
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, at 19:07:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 19:07 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
> Peter Meyns wrote:
>> I'm testing if The Bat! can handle my PGP key when I use PGP version
>> 6.5.8ckt09b3 by the plugin DLL. It doesn't work with GnuPG. (see
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Henk,
on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:18:06 +0200GMT, you wrote:
>> Thank you all for your replies. At least, now I know one way to use
>> PGP/MIME with The Bat! if need be. :-)
HMdB> I am using GPG for this ;-)
I wish I could too... https://www.rit
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, at 19:38:23 [GMT +0200] (which was 19:38 where I
live) Peter Meyns wrote:
Hi Peter,
> on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:18:06 +0200GMT, you wrote:
HMdB>> I am using GPG for this ;-)
> I wish I could too... https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 is
> still alive. ;-)
Yes, I hope
14 matches
Mail list logo
