Re: Virtual folders usability

2005-05-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello George, On Fri, 6 May 2005 08:04:12 +0300 GMT (06/05/2005, 12:04 +0700 GMT), George M. Menegakis wrote: GMM> No, it contains just two conditions: Receive Date > 01/01/2004 && Receive Date GMM> < 01/01/2005 That blows my theory apart. -- Cheers, Thomas. Woran erkennen Sie, das Sie als

Re: Virtual folders usability

2005-05-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello George, On Thu, 5 May 2005 21:49:23 +0300 GMT (06/05/2005, 01:49 +0700 GMT), George M. Menegakis wrote: GMM> ANY, and I mean ANY change I try to do on this VF using "Folder Properties" GMM> dialog results 99% CPU for a minute and the ghost dialog. Does the VF contain many filter conditions

Re: Virtual folders usability

2005-05-05 Thread MAU
Hello George, > I am sorry to say but ANY program I know that has virtual folders beats hands > down the bat. I'm not familiar enough with VFs in other programs, all I can say is that I currently have and use 78 VFs and they perform quite well. I never have to wait more than a few second when I

Re: Virtual folders usability

2005-05-05 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello George M. Menegakis & everyone else, on 05-Mai-2005 at 20:22 you (George M. Menegakis) wrote: > 1. What is the point of "Store state between sessions" if after reopening Bat > the virtual folders appears empty and I have to select "Refresh" in order to > see the messages? I don't have such

Virtual folders usability

2005-05-05 Thread George M. Menegakis
Hello ppl, I don't know if this issue came with latest beta because till today I haven't tried using "Virtual Folders". The sad point is that, at least as implemented for Bat, the Virtual Folder concept is pretty useless for large mail base. Yesterday I imported four big folders from mbx format.