testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest algo RIPEMD160. Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat! when this digest algo had been used. -- Henk M. de Bruijn __ The Bat!

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 02:36:56 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:36 where I live) I myself wrote: > This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest > algo RIPEMD160. > Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat! > when this digest algo had been used. It

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Bill McCarthy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 21-Jul-05 7:36pm -0500, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: > This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest > algo RIPEMD160. > > Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat! > when this digest algo had

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, at 19:42:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 2:42 where I live) Bill Mccarthy wrote: > On Thu 21-Jul-05 7:36pm -0500, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote: >> This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest >> algo RIPEMD160. >> >> Till now it has not been possible to verify

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Peter Meyns
Henk M. de Bruijn schrieb: > This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest > algo RIPEMD160. > > Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat! > when this digest algo had been used. Verifies good with Thunderbird/Enigmail, but The Bat! states a si

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Henk, On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:36:56 +0200GMT (22-7-2005, 2:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: HDB> This message has been signed pgp/mime. In this case I have used digest HDB> algo RIPEMD160. HDB> Till now it has not been possible to verify this message with the Bat! HDB> when this digest a

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-22 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Fri 22-Jul-05 1:05am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote: > Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 What LDAP server are you using? I have very little luck verifying with pgp.surfnet.nl. I am beginning to wonder if there may be a bug in the GnuPG software. For your signature I get: gpg: Signature made 07/22/05

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-22 Thread Bill McCarthy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri 22-Jul-05 1:05am -0500, Roelof Otten wrote: > Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 One follow up question - when I sign with GnuPG and PGP/MIME turned on, the PGP/MIME does not appear to be working. Are you or anyone else experiencing this? - -- Bes

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-22 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 08:05:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:05 where I live) Roelof Otten wrote: > Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 and PGP 8.1 That's interesting! Testing PGP 8.1 BTW I know that other MUA's do not have any problem with RIPEMD160 -- Henk M. de Bruijn

Re: testing other digest algo

2005-07-22 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 13:52:11 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:52 where I live) I myself wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, at 08:05:41 [GMT +0200] (which was 8:05 where I > live) Roelof Otten wrote: >> Verifies fine with TB 3.51.8 and PGP 8.1 > That's interesting! Testing PGP 8.1 > BTW I know that othe

Re[2]: testing other digest algo

2005-07-22 Thread Michael Acklin
Friday, July 22, 2005, 2:05:02 AM, (Internet Time - @336) you wrote: Hello Bill, BM> What LDAP server are you using? I have very little luck BM> verifying with pgp.surfnet.nl. I am beginning to wonder if BM> there may be a bug in the GnuPG software. I have been using pgp.mit.edu to find about