On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 11:23 +0200, Timo Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Łukasz Hawryłko wrote:
> > In few words - when multiple SINITs is loaded, there is a chance that
> > one (or more) of them will be overwritten by some TBOOT data structures
> > that have hardcoded addresses. In
Hi Timo
On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 09:09 +0200, Timo Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in https://sourceforge.net/p/tboot/mailman/message/37340469/ there was a
> discussion about needing to get grub to accept a patch to reliably support
> multiple SINIT modules. Any idea what's the status of this patch?
>
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022, Łukasz Hawryłko wrote:
In few words - when multiple SINITs is loaded, there is a chance that
one (or more) of them will be overwritten by some TBOOT data structures
that have hardcoded addresses. In most cases it is memory log, but this
is not a rule.
This sounds annoy
Hi,
in https://sourceforge.net/p/tboot/mailman/message/37340469/ there was a
discussion about needing to get grub to accept a patch to reliably support
multiple SINIT modules. Any idea what's the status of this patch?
Using multiple SINIT modules is useful if you want to have a single image
