Re[2]: tb under heavy load

Sunday, October 26, 2003, 2:25:29 AM, Gerard wrote: G> ON Sunday, October 26, 2003, 1:57:49 AM, you wrote: NL>> 122,959 now... G> Neal, G> Now you ar just trying to get to 200k in a hurry ;-) Actually I'm sitting at ~120K messages spread out in fair amount of folders. The processor is an AMD X

Re: tb under heavy load

ON Sunday, October 26, 2003, 1:57:49 AM, you wrote: NL> 122,959 now... Neal, Now you ar just trying to get to 200k in a hurry ;-) -- Best regards, Gerard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= On the course, golfers must have the confidence of a champion. But

Re[4]: tb under heavy load

Saturday, October 25, 2003, 5:39:07 PM, Anthony wrote: >> 122,959 now... AGA> What type of database does TB use (if any)? I'm not quite sure what's being used here I would think it would be some kind of ISAM database scheme, but the text is fully accessable to me. One thing I'm very happy with