Hello Carsten,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 2:26:48 PM, you wrote:
>> Do you mean code for "Week of the year"?
CT> ... and don't forget that there is more than one definition for
CT> »week of the year«. :-/
Seems I started something off. I hadn't thought of the possible
interpretations of what
Hello Alexander,
On Sunday, November 23, 2003 at 4:33:07 PM you [AL] wrote (at least in
part):
DH>> The second def - now standard - allows the 1st, 2nd and 3rd January to
DH>> be in the 53rd week of the year, hence the last days of the year
DH>> before.
AL> But according ISO, 1-st Jan 2003 was in
Hello Dierk,
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:41:36 +0100 (23.11.2003 13:41 my local time)
you wrote about "Week of the year"
at least in part:
DH> The second def - now standard - allows the 1st, 2nd and 3rd January to
DH> be in the 53rd week of the year, hence the last days of the year
DH> before
Hello Peter,
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 01:42:04 +0100 (23.11.2003 05:42 my local time)
you wrote about "Week of the year"
at least in part:
PO> The Mathematics of the ISO 8601 Calendar
Good, I'll implement ISOWeek on this base
--
Best regards,
Alexander Leschinsky
- MOTD:
For NASA, space is
Hello Alexander!
On Sunday, November 23, 2003 at 1:33:33 AM you wrote:
> But 1-st January _is_ in week number 1?
No. As has been pointed out there are at least two different
definitions:
1. The week with the first of January in it is Week 1.
2. ISO says, the first week containing at least four
