Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Hello , I knew that I'd eventually have to do this, but I didn't predict that it would be now, especially with all that has been recently happening. Though they may seem to be connected, they really aren't. I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL, TBBETA and TBTECH), ef

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Hello Allie, > Note that I'll not be leaving the lists entirely. I'll still be > around, but no longer as an official trouter. We'll all miss the 'moderate' moderator you were :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.0

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Allie [A], On 01-09-2004 14:05, you wrote in : AM> I'll be stepping down as one of the moderators of the lists (TBUDL, AM> TBBETA and TBTECH), effective as of now. Thank you very much for your work, Allie. You have done a wonderful job! -- Best regards Peter Fjelste

Re: Tenure as List Moderator Ends

Hi Allie, A big thanks for all the time, effort, and help you have provided over the years! I know you've always been a great help to me. -- Cheers, Dean Back to 2.12.00 for the moment. Windows 2000 5 0 2195 http://www.silverstone

Re: Help with SMTP/POP problem

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 5:49:50 PM, you wrote: ND>> I'd like to really ramp up the rates, but would like to be able to ND>> automate the detection of missing messages. RO> Assuming that your company is checking mail with a regular interval, RO> you could agree with a number of con

Mod: Lost and found

Hi T'Buddlers, Okay - so now you're all in trauma over the release of 3.0, here's another bombshell for y'all. It is with a heavy heart that I write to you to formally wave a very, *very* fond farewell to Allie Martin. He is stepping down as list moderator from today. Allie has been moderating t

Re: Mod: Lost and found

Hello Marck, > Now ... we had a good look around and, although we can never replace > Allie, we hope that you will accept our choice of a new moderator to > step up to the breach. Please welcome Roelof Otten to the role of > newbie-mod! Clap! Clap! Clap! I applaud your choice and thank Roelof bef

Re: Mod: Lost and found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ~~( __ _"o Was Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 16:43:18 +0200, @ @ when MAU wrote: > Hello Marck, >> Now ... we had a good look around and, although we can never replace >> Allie, we hope that you will accept our choice of a new moderator

Re:Mod: Lost and found

Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 3:14:34 PM, Marck wrote: M> Please welcome Roelof Otten to the role of M> newbie-mod! He has been one of the most polite and helpful members of M> these lists over the years and has certainly earned our respect for M> that. We hope that he will deserve yours in the sa

Re: Should I upgrade from v1.xx IMAP to v2.xx IMAP? (Was: Re: I'm fed up with ...)

Now that 3.0 has been released, can anyone speak to the IMAP capabilities in the version 3.0? I didn't see any detail on the RIT Labs website. Are any of the issues Allie cites below addressed in v3.0? Thanks. - twf Tuesday, August 24, 2004, you wrote: > Terry Frazier, [TF] wrote: > I read

Mime Preamble

Hi, Since upgrading from version 1, I've noticed TB is not showing any MIME Preambles. To test, I sent a MIME email with a preamble to a TB address and an Outlook Express address. OE shows the preamble when I view the message source, and TB doesn't. Does anyone know why this change has occurred

regexp help reqd

This isn`t a problem with TheBat, but you guys might be able to assist - i`d like to be able to use a regexp with mailwasher to filter multiple addressees, so if there are more than say 6 email addresses in a TO: / CC: line, i`d like to mark it for deletion. Any suggestions ? - I think it might in

Re: Mod: Lost and found

Anne- Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 9:12:26 AM, you wrote: A> Sad though I am to lose Allie as a mod I would be hard-pressed to A> think of a better replacement than Roelof, so yours is a wise A> choice IMHO, and congrats to Roelof. :) Indeed. And welcome to moderatorhood, Roelof - out of the fr

Re: regexp help reqd

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 23:49:57 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, September 2, 2004 00:49 my local time) Colin Wilson wrote: > This isn`t a problem with TheBat, but you guys might be able to assist > - i`d like to be able to use a regexp with mailwasher to filter > multiple addressees, so if there

Re: Should I upgrade from v1.xx IMAP to v2.xx IMAP? (Was: Re: I'm fed up with ...)

Terry Frazier, [TF] wrote: > Now that 3.0 has been released, can anyone speak to the IMAP > capabilities in the version 3.0? I didn't see any detail on the RIT > Labs website. Are any of the issues Allie cites below addressed in > v3.0? Reliability and performance have been enhanced. You really

Re[2]: regexp help reqd

Hello Zygmunt, ZW> Try to use following regexp: (?is)([EMAIL PROTECTED]){7,} ZW> It can be quite slowly because of many matches, but it should work. Thanks, i`ll give it a whirl... -- Best regards, Colinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: regexp help reqd

On Thursday, September 2, 2004, at 00:50:46 [UTC+0100] (Thursday, September 2, 2004 01:50 my local time) Colin Wilson wrote: ZW>> Try to use following regexp: (?is)([EMAIL PROTECTED]){7,} ZW>> It can be quite slowly because of many matches, but it should work. > Thanks, i`ll give it a whirl... O

Re: regexp help reqd

Hello Colin, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:49:57 +0100 (02.09.2004 4:49 my local time), received Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 5:27:53 +0600, you wrote about "regexp help reqd" at least in part: CW> if there are more than say 6 email addresses CW> in a TO: / CC: line, i`d like to mark it for

Tenure as List Moderator Ends

>> Note that I'll not be leaving the lists entirely. I'll still be >> around, but no longer as an official trouter. out of curiosity, will your first posting as a non-moderator be top posted and without a delimiter? Cheers Cricket -- Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess. -

Re: Should I upgrade from v1.xx IMAP to v2.xx IMAP? (Was: Re: I'm fed up with ...)

Allie Martin wrote: Reliability and performance have been enhanced. What about filtering? Does one still have to select the Inbox and wait? Or has it become an automatic thing like with Thunderbird? -- Dave http://www.silverstones.com/theba

Re: Should I upgrade from v1.xx IMAP to v2.xx IMAP? (Was: Re: I'm fed up with ...)

Dave Gorman, [DG] wrote: >> Reliability and performance have been enhanced. > What about filtering? Does one still have to select the Inbox and > wait? Or has it become an automatic thing like with Thunderbird? So far, it's been automatic here, though it's not as smooth as with ThunderBird in th

Re: Should I upgrade from v1.xx IMAP to v2.xx IMAP?

Allie [A], On 25-08-2004 03:32, you wrote in : AM> What are the current problems with IMAP? (snip) 10. No "drafts" folder. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/8 Windows XP 5.1.2600 ht