Re: Windows XP Home's File Permiissions (slightly off topic but..)

Dan Grunberg @ 2004-Nov-21 2:23:33 PM "Windows XP Home's File Permiissions (slightly off topic but..)" > Recently I upgraded(?) to a Windows xP Home System. The lack of a > W2000-like concept of group permissions is most inconvenient. It's still very much so there; the

Windows XP Home's File Permiissions (slightly off topic but..)

Recently I upgraded(?) to a Windows xP Home System. The lack of a W2000-like concept of group permissions is most inconvenient. I found these at TweakXP's Home page. I thought I should solicit second opinions. 1. Are the tweaks reversable? 2. Will the tweaks ever HAVE to be reversed? 3. Will

Re: To all virus code resenders (-:

Hi Mica, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:55:03 +0100GMT, you wrote: MM> Please "do not feel singled out", (-; but all re-senders of the virus MM> code will be for the next 24 hours in my temporary Selective Download MM> filter. I'm sorry if I caused any inconvenience at your side. It was meant to test th

To all virus code resenders (-:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please "do not feel singled out", (-; but all re-senders of the virus code will be for the next 24 hours in my temporary Selective Download filter. The first test message, sent by Peter (Meyns), I had accepted as a such and I responded to, but all the

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Peter, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 09:43:37, you wrote: PM> Hi there, PM> I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text PM> string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. PM> Thank you, Johannes! :-) PM> But how about a virus code coming with

Re[2]: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Peter, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 5:13:07 PM, you wrote: > Hi Sean, > on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:59:52 +GMT, you wrote: >>> Caught by AntiVir here (Worm/DocIRC.B.1) in two messages, yours and >>> Sean's. While TB was downloading messages, AVir asked what to do with >>> the message, I told

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hi Sean, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:59:52 +GMT, you wrote: >> Caught by AntiVir here (Worm/DocIRC.B.1) in two messages, yours and >> Sean's. While TB was downloading messages, AVir asked what to do with >> the message, I told it to rename and to stack it in the calaboose, since >> I was curious t

Re[2]: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Mica, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:42:17 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >***^\ ."_)~~ > ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 21 Nov 2004, >@ @ at 16:43:37 +0100, when Peter Meyns wrote: >> Hi there, >> I just found that the mail

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Peter Meyns @ 2004-Nov-21 11:36:25 AM "OT: Eicar Test" >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* >> This is NOT the correct TEXT eicar string. You can find it at >> > No, of course it isn't. T

Re: OT: Eicar Test

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Sun, 21 Nov 2004, @ @ at 16:43:37 +0100, when Peter Meyns wrote: > Hi there, > I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text > string in the body (tried Eica

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hi Johannes, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:07:03 +0100GMT, you wrote: JMP> On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:43:37 +0100, Peter Meyns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text >> string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. >> Than

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hi Luigi, on Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:19:44 +0100GMT, you wrote: LR> Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:43:37 PM, you wrote: PM>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* LR> This is NOT the correct TEXT eicar string. You can find it at LR>

Re[2]: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Luigi, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:19:44 PM, you wrote: > Hello Peter, > Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:43:37 PM, you wrote: PM>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* > This is NOT the correct TEXT eicar string. You can find it at >

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Peter, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 4:43:37 PM, you wrote: PM> [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVPNE-FGNAQNEQ-NAGVIVEHF-GRFG-SVYR!$U+U* This is NOT the correct TEXT eicar string. You can find it at Of course I don't post it, otherwise my ClamAV wo

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Dear Peter, On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:43:37 +0100, Peter Meyns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text > string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. > Thank you, Johannes! :-) 2004-11-21 16:05:29 1CVtHN-0003c1-0v H

Re: OT: Eicar Test

Hello Peter, Sunday, November 21, 2004, 3:43:37 PM, you wrote: > Hi there, > I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text > string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. > Thank you, Johannes! :-) > But how about a virus code coming with a differ

OT: Eicar Test

Hi there, I just found that the mailing list server doesn't accept a virus text string in the body (tried Eicar), which I consider a very good thing. Thank you, Johannes! :-) But how about a virus code coming with a different character set? I'm just curious... ;-) [EMAIL PROTECTED](C^)7PP)7}$RVP