Hello Januk,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 09:58:36 -0700 (07.05.2004 22:58 my local time),
received Saturday, May 8, 2004 at 10:47:26 +0600,
you wrote about "Filtering email addresses out of message body"
at least in part:
JA> I'm sure you could do it. :-)
JA> The basic
Hello Januk,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 10:48:51 -0700 (07.05.2004 23:48 my local time),
received Saturday, May 8, 2004 at 10:47:31 +0600,
you wrote about "Filtering email addresses out of message body"
at least in part:
JA> But as I mentioned above, my servers don't hand
Hello Jonathan,
On Fri, 7 May 2004 12:13:55 -0500 (07.05.2004 23:13 my local time),
received Saturday, May 8, 2004 at 10:47:26 +0600,
you wrote about "Filtering email addresses out of message body"
at least in part:
JA> I've seen postfix and sendmail working like t
Hello Jernej,
On Friday, May 7, 2004 at 7:41:46 PM you [JS] wrote (at least in
part):
>> Yes it is... I believe most SMTP servers treat anything after the +
>> sign as method of separation... ie, anything before the + is the real
>> mailbox, anything after the client could use to do filtering on.
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 19:29:42, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> Interesting. So a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would get
> delivered to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and the +ricky *could* be used as the
> client wishes?
Only if the server is configured to allow that.
--
begin .sig
< Jernej Simoncic >< ht
On Friday, May 7, 2004, 19:13:55, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> Yes it is... I believe most SMTP servers treat anything after the +
> sign as method of separation... ie, anything before the + is the real
> mailbox, anything after the client could use to do filtering on. I've
> seen postfix and sendmai
On Friday, May 07, 2004, Jonathan Angliss wrote...
> That is the behaviour in the above mentioned SMTP servers. You can
> test, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or randomly pick anything after the + to
> prove I've not randomly made up some aliases for you :) Though a
> random thought on my end, I have a filteri
On Friday, May 07, 2004, Januk Aggarwal wrote...
JA>> Yes it is... I believe most SMTP servers treat anything after the
JA>> + sign as method of separation... ie, anything before the + is
JA>> the real mailbox, anything after the client could use to do
JA>> filtering on. I've seen postfix and send
On Friday, May 07, 2004, Januk Aggarwal wrote...
AL>> e-mails can be catched by this regexp
AL>> [_a-zA-Z\d\-\.\+]+@([_a-zA-Z\d\-]+(\.[_a-zA-Z\d\-]+)+)
> That's interesting. I didn't know that the + character was allowed
> in the username portion of an address. According to that regexp,
> <[EMAI
Hello Januk,
On Thu, 6 May 2004 09:53:06 -0700 (06.05.2004 22:53 my local time),
received Friday, May 7, 2004 at 10:24:03 +0600,
you wrote about "Filtering email addresses out of message body"
at least in part:
JA> You can extend that to get all the addresses with a fai
Hello Frank,
On Thu, 6 May 2004 09:59:55 +0200 (06.05.2004 13:59 my local time),
received Thursday, May 6, 2004 at 15:02:49 +0600,
you wrote about "Filtering email addresses out of message body"
at least in part:
F> No the messages are bounces from a mailing list so
Hello Frank,
On Thu, 6 May 2004 09:59:55 +0200GMT(06.05.2004, 09:59 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
> I can understand your concerns, but I have a opt-in mailing list
> (Mojo) running and after some years I get a high amount of bounces as
> a lot of people changed email accounts, switched ISP's
Hi Januk,
>> I'm looking for a solution to filter email addresses out of the body
>> text into a text file. So if there is a text like
>The exact nature of the solution depends on your requirements. What
>is your goal? Are you trying to extract all addresses, just the
>first, the last one or s
ON Wednesday, May 5, 2004, 7:08:19 PM, you wrote:
JA> Thanks. I imagine that it is very unlikely that Frank is a spammer,
JA> but I don't really want to post a solution that someone with more
JA> shady intentions could abuse.
Januk,
Your absolutely right. That is what I meant by "nicely put"
ON Tuesday, May 4, 2004, 8:52:57 PM, you wrote:
JA> Do you mind telling us why you're harvesting these addresses? A
JA> general solution based on the description you've given so far has too
JA> many potentially negative applications for my tastes.
Januk,
Very nicely put, without the use of offe
Hello,
I'm looking for a solution to filter email addresses out of the body text into a text
file. So if there is a text like
bla bla bla bla bla [EMAIL PROTECTED] bla bla bla bla...
the address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be written in a text file. I assume that I
will need regluar expression
16 matches
Mail list logo
