Graham Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its use on the internet was "pioneered" as an early attempt at
> confusing "spam robots" which scour Usenet message text for e-mail
> addresses. To that end it was somewhat effective..Its main effect was
> to cause newbies to complain that they didn't u
Hello Silviu,
On Monday, March 18, 2002 at 1:50:21 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
SC> Hmm what kind of encryption does this ROT13 do ?
It's an old 'Ceasars Code' mechanism:
Rotates the alphabet by xx characters. In this case '13'.
So 'A' becomes 'N', 'B' becomes 'O'
Hello Silviu
> Heh I hope Rot13 is more advanced than that :)
Nope.. Rot13 was "invented" in pre-history as as simple shift 13
characters up the alphabet obfuscation scheme.
Its use on the internet was "pioneered" as an early attempt at
confusing "spam robots" which scour Usenet message text for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 2:44:38 PM ,
Carsten Thönges wrote the following
on the "Rot13 encryption" thread:
CT> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
Hmm what kind of encryption does th
Hello Carsten,
On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 11:50:43 PM you wrote (at least in part):
CT> I know, but that one is best for _viewing_ Rot-13 text ;-)
Oh no ... no problem writing your text and choosing ROT13 as ancoding
in editor ...
OK, it's the whole mail getting 'encoded', that's the only di
Hi Melissa,
>> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
MR> And so... my question is: Why? Why rot13 at all? It's not
MR> "encryption", it's igpay atinlay. :-)
,-
| How many hardware engineers does it take to change a lightbulb?
| Abar: "Jr'yy svk vg va fbsgjner."
Hi Gerd,
* Gerd Ewald writes:
GE> On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 GMT your local time,
GE> which was 17.03.2002, 19:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
>> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
GE> Well done! But why don't you use the possibility that is offered o
Hello Carsten,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 (17.03.02 23:35 my local time)
you wrote about "Rot13 encryption"
at least in part:
CT> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
Only one question - why don't use XLAT
Hello Carsten Thönges !
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was 17.03.2002, 19:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
[...]
Well done! But why don't you use the possibility that is offered on
Hi Carsten!
CT> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
Could you also do the same thing for ROT18 (including numbers)? I think it
should be part of TB anyways...
Guti
--
__
Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 10:35:18 AM PST, Carsten Thönges wrote:
> it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
And so... my question is: Why? Why rot13 at all? It's not
"encryption", it's igpay atinlay. :-)
Melissa
- --
Hi list,
it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-)
This is another one of these recursive templates. Use it like this:
simply copy some (short!) text into the clipboard and execute the r13
quick template (r13 Ctrl+Space).
You'll need both attached templates. And don't forg
12 matches
Mail list logo
