Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-18 Thread Graham Foster
Hello Silviu Heh I hope Rot13 is more advanced than that :) Nope.. Rot13 was invented in pre-history as as simple shift 13 characters up the alphabet obfuscation scheme. Its use on the internet was pioneered as an early attempt at confusing spam robots which scour Usenet message text for e-mail

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-18 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Silviu, On Monday, March 18, 2002 at 1:50:21 PM you wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): SC Hmm what kind of encryption does this ROT13 do ? It's an old 'Ceasars Code' mechanism: Rotates the alphabet by xx characters. In this case '13'. So 'A' becomes 'N', 'B' becomes 'O'

Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi list, it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) This is another one of these recursive templates. Use it like this: simply copy some (short!) text into the clipboard and execute the r13 quick template (r13 Ctrl+Space). You'll need both attached templates. And don't

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 10:35:18 AM PST, Carsten Thönges wrote: it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) And so... my question is: Why? Why rot13 at all? It's not encryption, it's igpay atinlay. :-) Melissa - --

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Carsten Guthardt-Schulz
Hi Carsten! CT it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) Could you also do the same thing for ROT18 (including numbers)? I think it should be part of TB anyways... Guti -- __ Archives :

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Carsten Thnges ! On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 17.03.2002, 19:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote: [...] it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) [...] Well done! But why don't you use the possibility that is offered on

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Carsten, On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 (17.03.02 23:35 my local time) you wrote about Rot13 encryption at least in part: CT it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) Only one question - why don't use XLAT for this task :-) But as exercise in @recursion

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi Gerd, * Gerd Ewald writes: GE On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:35:18 +0100 GMT your local time, GE which was 17.03.2002, 19:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote: it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) GE Well done! But why don't you use the possibility that is offered on GE

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi Melissa, it's slow, it's ugly, it's a rot13 encoder for TB!'s editor ;-) MR And so... my question is: Why? Why rot13 at all? It's not MR encryption, it's igpay atinlay. :-) ,- | How many hardware engineers does it take to change a lightbulb? | Abar: Jr'yy svk vg va fbsgjner. `-

Re: Rot13 encryption

2002-03-17 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Carsten, On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 11:50:43 PM you wrote (at least in part): CT I know, but that one is best for _viewing_ Rot-13 text ;-) Oh no ... no problem writing your text and choosing ROT13 as ancoding in editor ... OK, it's the whole mail getting 'encoded', that's the only