Hello Listmembers,
On Thu, 25 May 2000 at 21:44:39 [GMT -0500] Allie Martin wrote:
Is there some way to get the address books to *always* sort by last
name?
I see what you mean and I see no way of changing this behaviour since
the address book invoked from the message editor
26/05/2000 10:54 GMT.
Hello TBUDL,
Now I know this has been covered before but as I've never
reinstalled Windows and TB I didn't take a great deal of notice.
I've just installed Win98SE, using Windows backup I made a backup of
my whole previous C drive beforehand.
On Fri, 26 May 2000 10:44:32 +0200, Dieter Hummel wrote:
You can sort alphabetical even in the addressbook invoked by the
editor by clicking the header bar 'Name' or 'Email' or whatever -
but the way name(s) is(are) displayed depends on the setting in the
addressbook-tab 'General |
On Fri, 26 May 2000 12:04:39 -0700, Tony Boom wrote:
Can anyone please tell me how/if I can recover my address book from
either a .qic backup or from a complete uncompressed backup of the
TB on a zip disc.
When I had migrated from NT4 to Win2k, I did a clean install. I
however
Hello David,
DH FWIW, I have had the Bat! V1.42f lock up several times for me with
DH imprting emails. This also happened to another Bat! user in my
DH office. The only solution we could find was to use another mail
DH program to respond to the emails and just delete them from the server.
DH
This message: 26/05/2000 16:31 GMT.
Hello Allie,
On 26 May 2000 at 07:18:42 GMT -0500 (which was 05:18 where I live)
Allie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
AM Simply restore the directories from the backup and restore the
AM registry key.
This is exactly what I have done. There are plenty of
Hi Tony,
On 27 May 2000 at 16:50:04 GMT -0700 (which was 00:50 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Address book?":
Could the fact that I've installed half a dozen or so beta's since
the backups were made have anything to do with it?
erm ..
On Fri, 26 May 2000 16:50:04 -0700, Tony Boom wrote:
Could the fact that I've installed half a dozen or so beta's since
the backups were made have anything to do with it?
Uhm, you restored a previous version over a newer version? I
don't quite get you there. I had assumed that you
Hi Allie,
Thursday, May 25, 2000, 8:00:22 PM, you wrote:
This is a known issue with TB! and a desire for
this to be changed has been voiced on quite a few previous
occasions. Let's hope that version 2 allows the message
list date display configurable.
Version 2 is in the making?
Hello Listmembers,
On Fri, 26 May 2000 at 06:34:46 [GMT -0500] Allie Martin wrote:
Clicking on the header bar, produces a page down scrolling
effect of the address book entries for me. It doesn't change how they're
sorted alphabetically.
Ok, seems you didn't notice that it /did/
This message: 26/05/2000 22:05 GMT.
Hello Allie,
On 26 May 2000 at 11:24:28 GMT -0500 (which was 09:24 where I live)
Allie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
AM Uhm, you restored a previous version over a newer version? I
AM don't quite get you there. I had assumed that you backed up
Morning Tony Boom,
All but one anyway, the one that reply's to a specific person on the
list, ie To: Allie on TBUDL rather than just Allie. So if Allie could
oblige me once more with that one I'd be very grateful.
I also made a universal macro thingie for mailing lists like this:
On Fri, 26 May 2000 23:42:09 +0200, Dieter Hummel wrote:
Ok, seems you didn't notice that it /did/ a sorting anyway. Select
an arbitrary entry in the addressbook and click on the header bar: you
will notice a change in placement (you call it scrolling): but if you
scroll up (or down)
Hi TBUDL,
I didn't get an announcement email from RIT's mailing list (yet - it
could just be early) but I noticed that a new version of TB! has been
released - the current version is now 1.44.
In case any of you don't get the announcements (presuming one goes
out) I thought you might like to
Mark,
Regarding your message dated: Saturday, May 27, 2000...
Sorry folks - I'm not desperate to reply to my own posts but I noticed
in the "What's new" text a message stating...
We felt that we should release 1.44 because we should add some
precaution steps against viruses jumping
On Thursday, May 25, 2000, 7:20:02 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
2) (and *this* is how the TB Address Book *should* be used in such
circumstances) have a separate AB entry for each address.
Personally, I think TB! should treat this situation like a lot of other
strategic Mailers do, and
Hello TBUDLers,
I am trying to find out exactly how long am I flying
on TB:) So, does anyone know [approximately] the time
when v1.15 was released?
I envy you guys who are Batoholics since v.1094:)))
Dejan
SD: Self
Hello TBUDL,
I have different PGP keys for different mail accounts. Is it way to
have The Bat! sign with a specified key based on which account mail
is sent from?
--
Best regards,
Christian Dysthe
http://christian.dysthe.tripod.com
ICQ: 3945810
PGP Public Key:
18 matches
Mail list logo
