Re: any way to turn THESE off???

2000-12-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Allen, On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:29:01 -0500GMT (12/12/2000, 08:29 +0800GMT), Allen Liou wrote: AL> 1) In Mail Dispatcher, reset READ and RECEIVE to be OFF upon start AL> (instead of pressing SHIFT 1 & 2) It's not Read (imp., rhymes with reed) but Read (past tense, rhymes with red): shortcom

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Marck, Monday, December 11, 2000, 6:52:55 PM, you wrote: MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP> Hash: SHA1 MDP> Hi George, MDP> On 12 December 2000 at 18:26:11 -0800 (which was 02:26 where I MDP> live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points: GFS>> No, and how rude of you

Re: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi George, On 12 December 2000 at 18:26:11 -0800 (which was 02:26 where I live) George F. Schoelles wrote and made these points: GFS> No, and how rude of you to think you are in any position to GFS> suggest you have the right or obligation to sensor

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Kari, Monday, December 11, 2000, 9:26:20 AM, you wrote: KJ> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- KJ> Hash: SHA1 KJ> Hello George, KJ> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, at 16:19:10 h [GMT -0800] KJ> you wrote this about "smapi": GFS>> Hello The Bat, GFS>> GFS>> Well I have searched the Web home for T

Re: OT: Re: news lists & Opera

2000-12-11 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello ztrader & other fellow TB! Users following this thread, Sunday, December 10, 2000, you stated: z>> Opera is now spyware. To which Allie responded: ACM>>> It would therefore seem that if you're a registered Opera 4 ACM>>> user, the adware is not installed. I installed version 5 on top A

Re[2]: OT: Re: news lists & Opera

2000-12-11 Thread ztrader
On Monday, December 11, 2000, 3:00:21 PM, A. Curtis Martin wrote: ACM It would therefore seem that if you're a registered Opera 4 ACM user, the adware is not installed. I installed version 5 on ACM top of my registered version 4. z>> Did you do the checks AFTER you installed ver 5?

Re: any way to turn THESE off???

2000-12-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Allen, On 12 December 2000 at 19:29:01 -0500 (which was 00:29 where I live) Allen Liou wrote and made these points: AL> 1) In Mail Dispatcher, reset READ and RECEIVE to be OFF upon start AL> (instead of pressing SHIFT 1 & 2) I don't know abou

any way to turn THESE off???

2000-12-11 Thread Allen Liou
Hi, I was wondering if there are ways to turn the following OFF automatically: 1) In Mail Dispatcher, reset READ and RECEIVE to be OFF upon start (instead of pressing SHIFT 1 & 2) 2) In Edit Mail Message, Auto-Format (SHIT-CTRL-F) OFF by default. thx! -- --

Re: OT: Re: news lists & Opera

2000-12-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I thought I'd comment on ztrader's contribution to the list, sent on Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:18:27 -0800: ACM>>> It would therefore seem that if you're a registered Opera 4 ACM>>> user, the adware is not installed. I installed version 5 on top ACM>>> of

Re: OT: Re: news lists & Opera

2000-12-11 Thread ztrader
On Sunday, December 10, 2000, 10:35:56 PM, Douglas Hinds wrote: ACM>> It would therefore seem that if you're a registered Opera 4 ACM>> user, the adware is not installed. I installed version 5 on top ACM>> of my registered version 4. Did you do the checks AFTER you installed ver 5? DH> I wonder

Re[2]: duplicating messages

2000-12-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Ming-Li, Sorry I haven't answered your questions sooner but I was considering your questions carefully. In a post time stamped re: "duplicating messages" you wrote: Ming-Li> Ok, I assume you use this one to move those msgs you've replied to Ming-Li> trash, right? (Why don't you do it w

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, In a post time stamped re: "smapi" you wrote: Marck> I understand your point and it is part of the list rules to leave Marck> moderation to the moderators. If a member finds themselves wishing to Marck> query the content of another member's posting, they should write to

Re[2]: Multiple e mails

2000-12-11 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi Dierk > Put a dummy address in the "To" field (just to make it look good; could > be "Just for laughs"), and the list (prepared in the address book) into > the "BCC" field. Viola, as Kelly Bundy puts it. The dummy address should be available - else you'll receive an error message from the

Re: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Kari Jakobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, at 18:30:37 h [GMT +] you wrote this about "smapi": MDP> I understand your point and it is part of the list rules to leave MDP> moderation to the moderators. If a member finds themselves wishing to MDP> q

Re: news lists

2000-12-11 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Karin! On Monday, December 11, 2000 at 3:29:33 AM you wrote: >> Opera is now spyware. See alt.privacy and alt.privacy.spyware and >> see also http://accs-net.com/smallfish/cydoor.htm > I have no hassle believing that I have since Opera tri

Re: Multiple e mails

2000-12-11 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Edward! On Monday, December 11, 2000 at 7:20:20 AM you wrote: > Folks...I think I just set off a firefight. Reality is that The Bat > advertises as a business tool to handle large lists of e mails. Whatever your reality is .. The way I se

Re: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 11 December 2000 at 12:37:45 -0500 (which was 17:37 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: JR>Are you a list moderator? JR>I think I asked this question once before but don't remember the JR>answer. The li

Re: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Kari Jakobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jan, On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, at 12:37:45 h [GMT -0500] you wrote this about "smapi": JR>Are you a list moderator? No, I am not. JR>I think I asked this question once before but don't remember the JR>answer. You did. Is only the li

Re[2]: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Kari, In a post time stamped re: "smapi" you wrote: Kari> This sig is a "How-Not-To-Do". 6 lines of text and 16 lines of sig. Kari> And the last sentence is even untrue and was even in the messages Kari> before. Kari> Could you please con

Re: smapi

2000-12-11 Thread Kari Jakobi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello George, On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, at 16:19:10 h [GMT -0800] you wrote this about "smapi": GFS> Hello The Bat, GFS> GFS> Well I have searched the Web home for The Bat and found no GFS> reference to an smapi plug-in for The Bat. Any directional GFS

Re[2]: Importing a X.509 certificate...?

2000-12-11 Thread Beat Strasser
Hi ArekG >As I remember, TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition can't import certificates >from sender's address. It was fixed in some later beta (I don't >remember, from which beta version), but in current version (beta/11) >it works almost well. >So all you need, is to upgrade to the ne

Re: Help compile a ISP list

2000-12-11 Thread Nick Gordon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jamie, Monday, December 11, 2000, 2:54:23 PM, you wrote: JD> Could we have a list of JD> mildly offensive words we could JD> use to JD> express extreme distaste. I'm not JD> sure everyone will appreciate the JD> full effect of Have pity on

Re[3]: news lists

2000-12-11 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Jan Rifkinson, On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 08:24:41 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Monday, December 11, 2000, 13:24:41 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR>In a post time stamped re: "news lists" you wrote: Interesting variation on how time works :-) Karin>> IE5 is

Help compile a ISP list

2000-12-11 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Melissa Cameron Barsic, On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:51:58 -0500 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, December 10, 2000, 16:51:58 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Melissa Cameron Barsic wrote: MCB> I thought some might be interested in the answer to this problem I MCB> posted. My ISP made adju

Re[2]: news lists

2000-12-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Karin, In a post time stamped re: "news lists" you wrote: Karin> IE5 is one of the worst in this respect. Plus, it has a Karin> reputation for bugs. ok, have it your way. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D Reply to: [EMAIL PROTE

DEAD HORSE (was Re: bedtime)

2000-12-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Fusiontunes, On 11 December 2000 at 01:09:51 -0500 (which was 06:09 where I live) Fusiontunes wrote and made these points: F> Dont you think your sorta wearing this out a little...?? This thread has become an unacceptable personal attack

Re: Mutiply e mails

2000-12-11 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Edward, On 11 December 2000 at 22:08:11 -0700 (which was 05:08 where I live) Edward Taylor wrote and made these points: ET> This issue here is overloading a mail server with the same ET> addresses being posted over and over again in each

Re: Mutiply e mails

2000-12-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Edward, On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 23:11:38 -0700GMT (11/12/2000, 14:11 +0800GMT), Edward Taylor wrote: ET> Maybe you need to re-examine what spam is. It is not e mail to opt-in, ET> targeted customers who have requested e mail about subjects they are ET> interested in. When I say "spam" I meant th

Re[2]: Multiple e mails

2000-12-11 Thread Nick Gordon
Hello Edward, Monday, December 11, 2000, 6:20:20 AM, you wrote: ET> All very misleading... when the ET> discussion list that supports the ET> software ET> opposes the basic premise on what ET> the software is supposed to be ET> doing. That's a little unfair, I think. The general content of repl