Hello
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 8:03:24 AM, someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Not according to the Oxford English dictionary here in "good old
> blighty". 'ise' is allowable but 'ize' is correct.
Down here in Oz we use "ise" instead of "ize" in most cases, AFAIK.
Ain't the wo
Saw a reference somewhere in the mailing list to a version 1.51. When
can the mere mortals share the spoils, so to spaek?
--
Regards,
John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hamster 1.3.22.1 Bat! 1.49 Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook
PCG-505TS Pentium 300
On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 2:49 AM
John Phillips tickled the keyboard keys on the subject of:
"New version".
My response follows:
JP> Saw a reference somewhere in the mailing list to a version 1.51. When
JP> can the mere mortals share the spoils, so to spaek?
Right now !!
http://www.
Hello
"Jody Watts" wrote On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 02:55:49 [GMT -0600] (19:55 Australian
Eastern Time,Thursday):
> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
Cannot find server or DNS Error
--
Regards
John Phillips Sydney, Australia
Hamster 1.3.22.1 Bat! 1.49 Windows 98 4.10 Build
Hello John,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 10:29:23 AM, you wrote:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
JP> Cannot find server or DNS Error
same here. server obviously down for some reason.
--
Best regards,
André
+++
Eternal Tedium Sound & Media Design
ht
On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 3:37 AM
André Engelhardt tickled the keyboard keys on the subject of:
"New version".
My response follows:
AE> Hello John,
AE> Thursday, March 01, 2001, 10:29:23 AM, you wrote:
>>> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
JP>> Cannot find server or DNS Error
Hello
"Jody Watts" wrote On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 03:44:51 [GMT -0600] (20:44 Australian
Eastern Time,Thursday):
> "New version".
> My response follows:
AE>> Hello John,
AE>> Thursday, March 01, 2001, 10:29:23 AM, you wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
What I meant to
Hello Jody,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 10:44:51 AM, you wrote:
JW> The FTP server is working ... the web server must be down ...
JW> --
JW> Jody
JW> The ULTIMATE security fix/patch for LookOut! and LookOut! Express ...
JW> The Bat! 1.51 Beta/1 ... Running on Windows NT 5.0 Service Pack 1
JW>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear John,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 12:08:31 PM, you wrote:
> What I meant to say ( why didn't you tell me I meant to say this?)
> was, after seeing 1.49 out of beta, then 1.49e and 1.51 in beta, where
> is a "non beta" 1.50 for the masses?
And wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jody!
On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 10:44:51 AM you wrote:
> The FTP server is working ... the web server must be down ...
About half an hour ago (some minutes more) the http server was up and
going - very fast. Since then I am on BETA ...
Hello all,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, Deniz Baygan wrote:
> And where's 1.49f ?
> I couldn't find it.
> Via web, 1.49 can be downloaded.
> Via FTP, there are 1.49c and 1.49e
> But I can't find 1.49f
1.49f version was for translators only.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.51 Beta
Hello
"Deniz Baygan" wrote On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 12:05:33 [GMT +0200] (21:05 Australian
Eastern Time,Thursday):
> I'm just collecting EVERY single version of TheBat! and even
> pre-versions are important.
> Any comments ?
Strange hobby! Do you want to buy a bridge, by any chance (just
k
> From: Dierk Haasis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> About half an hour ago (some minutes more) the http server was up and
> going - very fast. Since then I am on BETA ...
Hard to believe isn't it that even TBUDL can /. a
site :).
--
Cheers,
Viboon
--
_
Hi John,
JP> What I meant to say ( why didn't you tell me I meant to say this?)
JP> was, after seeing 1.49 out of beta, then 1.49e and 1.51 in beta, where
JP> is a "non beta" 1.50 for the masses?
It's at the same place where you find Netscape 5 ;-)
--
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL Members!
Since I am in the process of building a new marketing scheme for
myself, I need multiple "personalities" and address books. These
have to contain partly the same addressees, who need different
templates for different acco
Hello Deniz,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:05:33 +0200 you wrote (on the subject of "1.49f
(was:New version)"):
DB> And where's 1.49f ?
http://www.batmail.de
DB> I'm just collecting EVERY single version of TheBat! and even
DB> pre-versions are important.
Here's a link to a collection of every version
Hello TB folks,
On the Hungarian TB list someone brought up the question of independent
Address Books per accouts. That is, if a number of users share the
computer, already having password-protected accounts etc., they
shouldn't be able to use each others' address books (not to mention TO:
histo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John!
On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 11:34:15 AM you wrote:
> Strange hobby! Do you want to buy a bridge, by any chance (just
> kidding!)
Got one too many?
- --
Dierk Haasis
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 1, 2001, at 3:10:53 AM, SyP Wrote:
S> Am I missing something really obvious (can be, since I'm the only user
S> of my machine), or TB really lacks in this functionality?
Like you, I am the only user on my Computer. I have two Accounts setup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello Listers,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001,
at 09:31:13 [GMT -0800] (which was 18:31 where I live)
Nick wrote:
S>> or TB really lacks in this functionality?
NA> Like you, I am the only user on my Computer. I have two Accounts setup
NA> in TB! and did notic
Hello
"Dierk Haasis" wrote On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 12:24:23 [GMT +0100] (22:24 Australian
Eastern Time,Thursday):
>> Strange hobby! Do you want to buy a bridge, by any chance (just
>> kidding!)
> Got one too many?
New version 1.51 now up at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Lija,
You wrote on 3/1/2001, 8:57 AM:
Lija> We just have to wait for "perfect Windows that fully support
Lija> Unicode" and use UTF-8 encoding, but, as I said, neither
Lija> Win9x/ME nor TB! fully support this... unfortunately! :(
AFAIK Win2K
Wednesday, February 28, 2001, 9:25:07 AM, SyP wrote:
> Maxim Masiutin wrote on TBBETA, 2/28/2001, 1:52 PM:
Maxim>> [-] Messages with attachments were not backed up if attachments
Maxim>> were forced into message bodies
> At least I think that could be the problem in your case.
No, that's not t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Just another query re- using PGP encryption. I notice that when I
encrypt a message that only the text is encrypted and not any
attachment. Is there any way of simultaneously encrypting the attachment
too? I realise that I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 1, 2001, at 9:12:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:
dcn> Just another query re- using PGP encryption. I notice that when I
dcn> encrypt a message that only the text is encrypted and not any
dcn> attachment. Is there any way of simultaneously en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
Thursday, March 01, 2001, 6:22:43 PM, you wrote:
JP> New version 1.51 now up at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
Is this a Beta or final?
- --
Best regards,
Davemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello Listers,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001,
at 19:45:14 [GMT +] (which was 20:45 where I live)
Dave wrote:
JP>> New version 1.51 now up at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html
DW> Is this a Beta or final?
Beta
- --
Using The Bat! v1.51 Bet
Hello
"Dave Wilson" wrote On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 19:45:14 [GMT +] (06:45 Australian
Eastern Time,Friday):
> Is this a Beta or final?
FWIR, only finals are put on this page.
--
Regards
John Phillips Sydney, Australia
Hamster 1.3.22.1 Bat! 1.51 Windows 98 4.10 Build ASon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 1, 2001, at 11:45:14 AM, Dave Wilson Wrote:
DW> Is this a Beta or final?
Dave, RITLabs have just released TB! 1.51 Final, but there is also a
Beta/1 released, which you can find on the Beta Page.
Nick
-=N.J. Andriash | Vancouver, B.C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi SyP,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 19:22:30 [GMT +0100, your local time]
(1.3.2001. at 19:22 was my local time), you wrote:
Lija>> We just have to wait for "perfect Windows that fully support
Lija>> Unicode" and use UTF-8 encoding, but, as I said, neith
30 matches
Mail list logo