Re: Problem fetching mail.

Hi A, On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, at 21:57:36 -0500 you wrote: > ZoneAlarm problems occur with Win2k Pro and not Win98/ME. In > fact it works fine with Win2k once the service pack hasn't been > applied. Well, I *am* using Win2k Pro, SP1, Zone Alarm and I don't have any problems. IIRC there was a versio

Quote / Cursor Problem.

Hi Lars, >That's because you have 'Auto Format' activated. Turn it off Thank for the advice. -- Best, Tim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators :

Re: Website

Hallo George, On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:20:02 -0800 GMT (01/04/2001, 09:20 +0800 GMT), George F Schoelles wrote: GFS> Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it. Have you tried with the triple "w", i.e. www.ritlabs.com instead of just ritlabs.com ? -- Cheers, Thomas.

Re: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hallo Brian, On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:57:35 -0500 GMT (01/04/2001, 04:57 +0800 GMT), Brian Clark wrote: BC> Here's two more parens just for good measure: () LOL -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. "Dear Teacher: Please excuse the stink on Bill's clothes. We've

Re[3]: Website

Saturday, March 31, 2001, 8:20:02 PM, you wrote: GFS> Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it. Maybe it's just too slow or something. If you're using an ISP, maybe a little nudge might get some results. You can always use another provider's DNS server, just edit yo

Re: Changing message replyto via filter

On 31-03-2001 at 14:49, Jan Rifkinson kindly wrote: > Hello Karin, Karin>> I might actualy start using memos from now on. > The only use I've found for memos is to use them as an alphabetical > list of tech notes. May I ask what you are thinking about using the > memo function for? To jot

Re: Problem fetching mail.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 21:32:58 -0500, Jan graced us with these comments: JR> I run zone alarm w TB! w/o a problem. If set correctly ZA requests JR> permission to allow each new program to to access the Internet. I just JR> have set TB! as one of those

Re: Problem fetching mail.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:05:54 +0200, Frank contributed this to our collective wisdom: FTR> It seems to crop up after I have been surfing the net for a while or FTR> reading news. I am using Using The Bat! v1.51 on Windows NT 5.0 Build FTR> 2195 Service

Re[2]: Problem fetching mail.

Hello Listers. On Saturday, March 31, 2001 02:42:49 [ +0100 GMT], Marck D. Pearlstone wrote the following in regards to 'Problem fetching mail.': FTR>> The problem is that I have trouble fetching mail. When I start my FTR>> PC and The Bat! everything seems OK, but after a while I can't FTR>> fet

Re: Upgrading from 1.49 to 1.51

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi mvgson, On 01 April 2001 at 20:32:22 -0500 (which was 02:32 where I live) mvgson wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: m> I'm a recent new user and currently use v1.49 on winNT 4.0. Is it m> OK for me to update to 1.51 and will my 1

Re: Problem fetching mail.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Frank, On 01 April 2001 at 03:05:54 +0200 (which was 02:05 where I live) Frank T. Rambøl wrote to TBUDL and made these points: FTR> The problem is that I have trouble fetching mail. When I start my FTR> PC and The Bat! everything seems OK, but

Re[2]: Website

Hello Ben, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 6:03:53 AM, you wrote: BM> www.ritlabs.com works here. If all else fails you can try BM> http://198.63.208.135 . Yeah, the IP works, so I wonder why my Nameserver is not keeping it. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Upgrading from 1.49 to 1.51

You should be able to install 1.51 over the top of 1.49 without any trouble what-so-ever. And, yes, your registration will remain in force . . . I don't know of any "gotchas" to warn you about- have yet to have an upgrade complaint . . . (This would most certainly the be right place to ask.)

Upgrading from 1.49 to 1.51

Hello BatPeople, I'm a recent new user and currently use v1.49 on winNT 4.0. Is it OK for me to update to 1.51 and will my 1.49 registration remain in force? Are there any gotchas I should look out for? Can I simply install 1.51 over top of 1.49? I hope this is the right place to ask. Thanks

Re[2]: Website

Hello Dierk, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 5:21:43 AM, you wrote: DH> No problem with this URL: http://www.ritlabs.com/ DH> - -- DH> Dierk Haasis Nope, still no resolution. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** *Thawte

Re[2]: Website

Hello Brian, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 5:12:52 AM, you wrote: BC> You're hitting the right address, right? BC> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/ BC> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html ritlabs.com is not even resolving, which leaves nothing to trace. -- Best regards, George

Problem fetching mail.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. I am a new user of The Bat! so I do not know if this problem has been discussed on this list before. If so I hope that you will forgive that and maybe point me in to a place where I can find the solution. The problem is that I have

TBUDL Mission Statement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Bat Listers, This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you of the primary purpose of this discussion list. To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message. ...

Re: OT A not so private comment

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Norbert, On 31 March 2001 at 15:56:36 + (which was 16:56 where I live) Norbert Lieckfeldt wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: NL> 1) is it possible with The BAT to include things like X-Mailer in NL> the header (whether it is

Re: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hi Oleg, @ 3:33:06 PM on 3/31/2001, Oleg wrote: ... > You know what? I do rarely delete messages. Most of them are kept > forever, or for some days and then are deleted automatically, or are > deleted by filters. So I do delete messages by accident very very > rarely. Some lists I archive by '

Re[3]: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Sunday, April 01, 2001, Dave Braze wrote to Brian Clark about Undo, Prievious view commands: BC>> IOW, what harm would there be in allowing a user to delete a BC>> message, then hit Ctrl+Z if they deleted the wrong one (which BC>> happens often - espe

Re[2]: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hello Brian, Saturday, March 31, 2001, 12:47:54, you wrote: BC> Hi Oleg, BC> IOW, what harm would there be in allowing a user to delete a message, BC> then hit Ctrl+Z if they deleted the wrong one (which happens often - BC> especially since some of us get hundreds of pieces of email in a d

Re: OT A not so private comment (was: Re: Viewing Messages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 18:41:09 +0200, Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote concerning 'OT A not so private comment (was: Re: Viewing Messages)': >> 1) is it possible with The BAT to include things like X-Mailer in the >> header (whether it

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On March 31, 2001, at 1:04:27 AM, Gerd Ewald wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.4d (r3/Cygwin) - GnuPGshell v1.60 Gerd, can you tell me if you compiled GPG yourself, or did you install one of the pre-compiled Win32 version

Re: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hi Oleg, @ 9:57:07 AM on 3/31/01, Oleg wrote: ... j>> By mistake I moved a message to a folder containing thousands of j>> messages. I don't remember which message it was and I wish to undo j>> this action. Is there a command (like that in Windows Explorer) for j>> this? > There is no spec

Re: OT A not so private comment (was: Re: Viewing Messages)

Hello Norbert! On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 5:56:36 PM you wrote: > 1) is it possible with The BAT to include things like X-Mailer in the > header (whether it is appropriate in this group or not?) I think not but can be wrong. Marck will know, I hope. > 2) if the PGP signature has the effect

Re: OT A not so private comment (was: Re: Viewing Messages)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:56:36 +, Norbert wrote these words of wisdom: NL> 1) is it possible with The BAT to include things like X-Mailer in the NL> header (whether it is appropriate in this group or not?) The X-Mailer is included in the headers b

Re: Quote & Cursor Position

Hi Tim, On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, at 17:13:09 +0100 you wrote: > When placing the cursor under a line of quoted text and typing, the > cursor 'pops up' and typing occurs next to the quoted text rather > than in the line under it (unless I press enter twice). > Is there a remedy for this? That's beca

Quote & Cursor Position

Hi TBUDL, When placing the cursor under a line of quoted text and typing, the cursor 'pops up' and typing occurs next to the quoted text rather than in the line under it (unless I press enter twice). Is there a remedy for this? -- Best, Tim mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: OT A not so private comment (was: Re: Viewing Messages)

Thank you for all your comments. I still think it's daft to PGP-sign every mail sent but since that seems to develop into a theological argument about beliefs and what is or is not better, let's give that one a rest. At least, I can cut out the PGP signatures so that I don't see them. Not so with

Re: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, Saturday, March 31, 2001, jlaikan wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about Undo, Prievious view commands: j> By mistake I moved a message to a folder containing thousands of j> messages. I don't remember which message it was and I wish to undo j> this action. Is ther

Re: Website

Sat day, March 31, 2001, 8:07:28 AM, you wrote: GFS> Hello Bat_Users, GFS> I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the GFS> ritlabs. www.ritlabs.com works here. If all else fails you can try http://198.63.208.135 . -- Benmailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Website

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 05:07:28 -0800, George wrote these words of wisdom: GFS> I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the ritlabs GFS> home page. Has the site changed or is it gone? I like to check it GFS> for updates and such whenev

Re: Website

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello George! On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 3:07:28 PM you wrote: > I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the ritlabs > home page. Has the site changed or is it gone? I like to check it for > updates and such whenever I can. No

Re: Website

Hi George, @ 8:07:28 AM on 3/31/01, George F Schoelles wrote: > I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the ritlabs > home page. Has the site changed or is it gone? I like to check it > for updates and such whenever I can. You're hitting the right address, right? http://www.ritl

Re[2]: Changing message replyto via filter

Hello Karin, On Friday, March 30, 2001 03:51:57 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Changing message replyto via filter': Karin> Blimey, you're right - although it is a bit buggy. I might Karin> actualy start using memos from now on. The only use I've found for memos is to us

Re: Undo, Prievious view commands

Hello jlaikan, On Friday, March 30, 2001 08:49:07 [ +0400 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Undo, Prievious view commands': jlaikan> By mistake I moved a message to a folder containing thousands of jlaikan> messages. I don't remember which message it was and I wish to undo jlaikan> th

Website

Hello Bat_Users, I've been getting "DNS error" whenever I try to check the ritlabs home page. Has the site changed or is it gone? I like to check it for updates and such whenever I can. -- Best regards, George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

acount settings keep changing

I have 2 acounts Linda and etrade, for both accounts i have under account properties, transport, the setting for smtp server: smpt.wish.nl. in the box : receive mail is : pop3.norton.antivirus . in the user box is in the case of the account Linda:,my user name for this account ,

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerd! On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 11:04:27 AM you wrote: > And to finish this: now a new attempt to use GPG properly Works! - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Window

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gerd, @ 4:04:27 AM on 3/31/2001, Gerd Ewald wrote: ... > And to finish this: now a new attempt to use GPG properly Came out just fine here. - -- Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web Architect, Designer, and Programmer PGP is spoken here: 0xE

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk Haasis and Roland! On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:36:58 +0200 GMT your local time, which was 31.03.2001, 10:36 (GMT+0200) where I live, you wrote: [...] > Checks out fine. Thanks for informing me. You replied on my message which didn't arrive

Re: PGP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Gerd! On Saturday, March 31, 2001 at 9:28:57 AM you wrote: > Ok, now let's try the standard version PGP 6.5.8ckt Checks out fine. - -- Dierk Haasis PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.52 Beta/1 Win

Re: PGP

Hi Gerd, on Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:28:57 +0200 GMT (which was 31.03.2001, 09:28 +0100 GMT where I live) Gerd Ewald wrote: > Ok, now let's try the standard version PGP 6.5.8ckt This is good: *** PGP Signature Status: good *** Signer: Gerd Ewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** Signer Key ID: 0xD56C61