Re[2]: Synchronising?

Hello Jeanny, Thursday, April 3, 2003, 8:36:36 PM, you wrote: JH> 1. I started with the laptop, clicked on Tools > Synchronise, then JH> chose Step 1 and created the .TB1 file, which I burned onto a CD. JH> 2. I put the CD into the desktop and ran Step 2, creating the .TB2 JH> file, which I bur

Re: 1.62o

B-stok/PL, Friday, April 4, 2003 Hello leea, On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, at 22:04:43 (which was 06:04 where I live) in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: > Anyone else notice 1.62o has been released? As of tonight, it doesn't > look like the What's New has been updated for

Re: OE Sheduler

> Hello Andriy, > On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:12:46 +0300 GMT (03/04/03, 17:12 +0700 GMT), > Andriy Podanenko wrote: >> are there any probability for compatibility The BAT and Outlook Express Sheduler? > I don't think so. But I understand the next TB version will include > its own scheduler. you pr

1.62o

Anyone else notice 1.62o has been released? As of tonight, it doesn't look like the What's New has been updated for the "o" release yet. Kinda would have liked to see the fix list for that puppy. Actually, no, I take that back. I'd prefer to see v2 out instead of 1.6x. http://www.ritlabs.com/

Re: OE Sheduler

Hello Andriy, On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:12:46 +0300 GMT (03/04/03, 17:12 +0700 GMT), Andriy Podanenko wrote: > are there any probability for compatibility The BAT and Outlook Express Sheduler? I don't think so. But I understand the next TB version will include its own scheduler. -- Cheers, Thomas

Re: Synchronising?

Hi Julian, JBL> Every so often I delete the mail folders from my laptop and recreate JBL> them from a backup of my PC installation. This ensures that I have all JBL> the same filters and messages. You need to be careful doing this, JBL> however, as it can cause problems! I'm curious how you ma

Re[2]: OT: HTML Processing Question

On Thursday, April 03, 2003, Scott wrote in : S> There was more answer than I am sure you bargained for... Scott, No, it was fine; thank you. I have two observations, though, for you. One is that TB! will not allow HTML or other code in e-mail to connect to the 'net ev

Re: macros for TB - what can i expect to see?

>> As I said earlier, I'm tired of experimenting and don't have the time >> to try out every quick template to see if I would like it. >> Unfortunate, but true. GS> I can fully understand this myself, since to a some degree I'm in the GS> same situation. I've been using TB for about a year. I'm

Re[2]: 1.62i will not run with my 1.53d mail database

Hello All, Tuesday, April 1, 2003, 10:28:16 AM, Roelof wrote: [A whole bunch of suggestions, for which many thanks] If others don't want to read much further, here's the executive summary: my problem seemed to be caused by the old ROOTCA.ABD file. When that's replaced by the one that comes with

Re[2]: Cleaning up duplicates in address book

On Thursday, April 3, 2003, 4:28:32 PM, you wrote: RO> Hallo David, RO> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:24:11 -0500GMT (3-4-03, 19:24 +0200, where I RO> live), you wrote: D Can I take all those duplicates and merge them? For example, if >>> Can only be done manually. D>> Well, that was my fear and exp

Re: macros for TB - what can i expect to see?

Hello Dhrakol, On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, at 00:02:04 GMT -0800 (4/3/2003, 2:02 AM -0500 GMT here), you wrote in : > pretty good, thanks. You are welcome. GS>> BTW if you never try, then you will never know. > Not true. Marck seems to be amenable to putting up some samples, whi

Re: Cleaning up duplicates in address book

Hallo David, On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:24:11 -0500GMT (3-4-03, 19:24 +0200, where I live), you wrote: D>>> Can I take all those duplicates and merge them? For example, if >> Can only be done manually. D> Well, that was my fear and expected response... :-) Of course you could export all addresses to

Re: Synchronising?

On Thursday, April 3, 2003, 7:19:39 PM, Barry Higginbottom wrote: > Can someone explain in easy steps how to carry out a synch > between the two machines from scratch? Synchronisation works by comparing the messages held in the messages of both machines and copying from the source machin

Re: Synchronising?

Thursday, April 3, 2003, 12:19:39 PM, Barry Higginbottom wrote: Barry> Can someone explain in easy steps how to carry out a synch Barry> between the two machines from scratch? Barry, I just did this a couple of days ago and I think it worked. Keep in mind the my desktop computer is th

Re: OT: HTML Processing Question

HTML is only a text file, its the internet program that makes it "live" so Internet Explorer, Netscape, Opera, Outlook, MS Word, Excel, and other programs that recognize HTML source code will make it "live" and do what the code says. If you open an HTML in notepad, the code will not become "live" a

Synchronising?

Dear TB Users OK, I know, I'm thick! I can't seem to grasp the logic of the synchronisation procedure. I have set up TB on my laptop and would like to synch between that and my PC. Can someone explain in easy steps how to carry out a synch between the two machines

Re: OT: HTML Processing Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 03, 2003, Joseph N. wrote... > Thanks, but the reason my inquiry is OT is that it's not about TB! > that I'm asking. Oups... hehe... my bad ;) > The best I can do is to restrict a message from opening up in HTML > without my delib

Re[2]: OT: HTML Processing Question

On Thursday, April 03, 2003, Jonathan Angliss wrote in : >> If an HTML-formatted message is received which (a) seeks to phone >> home in order to receive a web bug, (b) is not viewed as HTML, i.e., >> is viewed as text if present, and (c) is viewed in an application >> th

Re[2]: Cleaning up duplicates in address book

On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, 11:25:03 PM, you wrote: ,- [ Roelof Otten said: ] | D> Can I take all those duplicates and merge them? For example, if | | Can only be done manually. `--- Well, that was my fear and expected response... :-) Thanks for answ

Re: OT: HTML Processing Question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, April 03, 2003, Joseph N. wrote... > If an HTML-formatted message is received which (a) seeks to phone > home in order to receive a web bug, (b) is not viewed as HTML, i.e., > is viewed as text if present, and (c) is viewed in an applicat

Re: te daily digest format

On Wednesday, April 02, 2003, Fabian J. González Berger wrote in : > i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a > lot of mails, :-) > i would like see another order in the messages of the daily digest, > for example today i recibed the next

Re: te daily digest format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Fabian, @2-Apr-2003, 11:28 -0400 (16:28 UK time) Fabian J. González Berger said: > i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a > lot of mails, :-) > i would like see another order in the messages of the daily digest,

OT: HTML Processing Question

If an HTML-formatted message is received which (a) seeks to phone home in order to receive a web bug, (b) is not viewed as HTML, i.e., is viewed as text if present, and (c) is viewed in an application that is not restricted in any manner from Internet access, including to port 80, would the code be

te daily digest format

Hellow TBUDL arroba thebat.dutaint.com i'm a "daily digest" susbcriber of the list, because you write a lot of mails, :-) i would like see another order in the messages of the daily digest, for example today i recibed the next messages secuence: 1. Insert Template Just before send me

OE Sheduler

Hello all! are there any probability for compatibility The BAT and Outlook Express Sheduler? Best regards Andriy Podanenko Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Ignore thread

MAU> I will post details in my website. The address of which is? -- Stuart Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ... and anything below is beyond my control - sorry ... Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" in

Re: Ignore thread

RO> you can add each next thread as an extra set on RO> the alternatives tab of your ignore filter. So I understand. TVM. -- Stuart Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ... and anything below is beyond my control - sorry ... ___