Dear all
puzzled me, one of my filter just won't work anymore all of a sudden
wondering
I just copy and paste the filter that I created
can anyone here shed some lights on this issue???
coz it is kinda frustrating to use the mail despatcher to tick the
receive box each time I check my email, coz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Knipfer [MK] wrote:
MK I have never heard of any software companies that penalized an end
MK user for modifying a program's compiled code to make it work to
MK their own needs.
The fact that you've never heard this doesn't mean that it hasn't
Hi The Bat! User Discussion list,
On Sunday, April 06, 2003 at 20:06:24GMT -0500 (which was 8:06 PM where I live)
Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of UBE:
JN Okay, I surrender. I have been content with dealing with spam on a
JN per-email basis, using the dispatch on
On Saturday, April 05, 2003, David Calvarese wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DC http://www.spampal.org
David and Luc,
Thank you. I'll try Spampal. One question about setup, though.
Normally, I would have TB! connecting on port x to my AV's POPscanner,
which then connects out on port 110.
Hi The Bat! User Discussion list,
On Sunday, April 06, 2003 at 21:08:46GMT -0500 (which was 9:08 PM where I live)
Joseph N. wrote and made these points on the subject of Spampal and NOD POPscan:
JNOn Saturday, April 05, 2003, David Calvarese wrote in
JN mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DC
On Sunday, April 06, 2003, Joseph N. wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JN Normally, I would have TB! connecting on port x to my AV's POPscanner,
JN which then connects out on port 110. Is it correct that I should keep
JN Spampal tuned in to the default port 110, and let Windows or Spampal
JN or
I have just started using Popfile ( http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ ) and am
really impressed with it. It handles my multiple email accounts wonderfully. I
also like that it will add a header line indicating spam option incase you do
not want to add a tag on the subject line.
I did use Norton
Okay, I surrender. I have been content with dealing with spam on a
per-email basis, using the dispatch on server feature, or just
dealing with the minor inconvenience. But now it's no longer a minor
inconvenience. Interestingly, I get almost no spam from the address
I use on mailing lists,
Hello Adam,
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:19:42 -0230 GMT (07/04/03, 07:49 +0700 GMT),
Adam wrote:
I set that shortcut to 'n' within TB. Only I wasn't in Browse Ticker,
as Bob was.
There are a few things I notice though. I can click N to move to the
next message, but not if I turn off the Message
Hello Javier,
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 21:17:00 +0200 GMT (07/04/03, 02:17 +0700 GMT),
Javier Carretero wrote:
Hello all. I have a problem with The Bat! and I discovered this list.
Welcome to the list. :-)
My Log Panel does not show any report when I download my email.
Are you talking about the
10 matches
Mail list logo
