Hi Luc,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:10:14 +0200 Luc wrote:
> After making a fresh account and ding a restore from my back ups, all
> my data from the memo field was gone and this for all of my accounts.
> Is there a way to retrieve them,
I'd guess the answer is "No".
> maybe a separate file they ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Staffan,
@24-Jun-2003, 18:47 +0300 (16:47 UK time) Staffan Enbom [SE] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
SE> I just set up this wonderful client with two accounts. The
SE> second account titled [EMAIL PROTECTED] looses it's settings
SE> (under general
Good evening list,
A few days ago i had what seemed to be a corrupted account which
caused TB! to crash. After making a fresh account and ding a restore
from my back ups, all my data from the memo field was gone and this
for all of my accounts. Is there a way to retrieve them, maybe a
I just set up this wonderful client with two accounts. The second
account titled [EMAIL PROTECTED] looses it's settings (under general and
transport). Did some digging through the archives for this with no
success... Anyone got any idea how to resolve this please?
Staffan Enbom
100777.com
_
Saturday, June 21, 2003, 3:06:57 AM, you wrote as quoted below:
Hi.
XP Pro SP1
NAV, turned off email scanning
Hard firewall in my router
T1, through router
POP3
No, only one account at a time
Many, many other tasks; but no more than is usual, except perhaps for
MS IM which I will now kill
RO
On Tue 24-Jun-03 3:41am -0400, Tim wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
RA>>> For example if the subject of the original message was "Fwd: test",
RA>>> then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA>>> original returns ": test".
AM>> .. as it should.
> No i
Allie
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, 3:25:47 PM, you wrote:
RA>> For example if the subject of the original message was "Fwd: test",
RA>> then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA>> original returns ": test".
>
> .. as it should. From the help:
>
> ,- [ %OSubj ]
> | OSUBJ
Hello Wilfried,
Saturday, June 21, 2003, 7:21:28 PM, you wrote:
WM> You right, but still it can maybe help Patricia and Barry. I assume it logs
WM> (winsock) errors (if there are). Does it not ?
The saga continues
This morning my mailbox contained 84 messages and stalled at
On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Allie Martin wrote:
RA>> For example if the subject of the original message was "Fwd: test",
RA>> then the %OSubj macro in a reply or forward template using that
RA>> original returns ": test".
AM> .. as it should.
No it shouldn't. I just tested and "Re: test" is correc
Hello Kevin,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 you wrote:
> Which method is preferred (ie: politically correct) when replying to a
> thread, keeping the "Re:" or stripping it?
Personally I prefer keeping "RE:" because it makes it easier to delete
additions to threads that I have previously deleted because I h
10 matches
Mail list logo
