Hallo Kevin,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:36:50 -0700GMT (9-8-2004, 22:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
KA>>> I'm not so sure. I can go back and look at various messages that I
KA>>> have received that did not thread (Gerard isn't the only instance) and
KA>>> in all cases, the In-Reply-To header is m
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Chris mused about "NOD32 Plug-In Beta." (at least
in part):
CW> NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW> plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW> mail is received via TLS and I am led to believ
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 15:41:19, Mike email (The Bat!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
BM>> I had to insert the Sender: header field manually (as X-Sender!) and
BM>> I had to save the message into the Outbox to get the Bat! to let me
BM>> p
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 22:38:27 [GMT+0200] (which was Tue, 4:38 [GMT+800]
Perth, Western Australia) you wrote:
[snips]
Alexander> A late reply, but nevertheless... I just found a rather nice monospaced
Alexander> font in TrueType format - its called "Monaco" and can be found here:
Alexander> htt
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, August 8, 2004, 4:36:01 AM, you wrote:
ASK> Hello Peter Kerekes,
ASK> 08-Aug-2004 00:21, you wrote:
>> Need some help to improve on Spam filtering.
ASK> Forgive me the stupid question, but do you actually "train" the BayesIt
ASK> filter if it has a false negative? (ri
Hi
Saturday, August 7, 2004, 9:27:58 AM, Bill McQuillan wrote:
BM> On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 12:32:38, Zonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have never seen a msg with multiple address in the From: field.
>> Maybe you could send one to demonstrate?
BM> I had to insert the Sender: header field manu
Hi
Anybody else have this problem?
If an attachment on an incoming message has a filename containing spaces,
everything after the first space is truncated. This includes the
extension, so you cannot open the attachment.
It seems to depend on which email application was used to send th
Hi Roelof Otten
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 21:15:20 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:15 PM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hallo Kevin,
> On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:37:15 -0700GMT (9-8-2004, 19:37 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
KA>> I'm not so sure. I can go back and
Hello Chris,
Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:51:14 PM, you wrote:
CW> NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
CW> plug-in and that it works. The reason I require a plug-in is because my
CW> mail is received via TLS and I am led to believe proxy scanners such as
CW> IMON
Hi all,
Unfortunately I'm having major problems with the Kaspersky plug-in and
TB!, which in a nutshell means, my incoming mail is unscanned at client
level.
Therefore, I'm having to assess the options.
NOD32 is up there on my list of alternatives, as long as there is a TB!
plug-in and that it w
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
27-Jul-2004 14:17, you wrote:
> We have found that a popular mono font is Andale Mono - if you can find
> that one, maybe you'll have a change of heart.
A late reply, but nevertheless... I just found a rather nice monospaced
font in TrueType format - its called "Mon
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:04:39 +0300 (2:04 PM EDT here) Robert Golovniov wrote:
> Hello!
> I have a little problem with my headers. In the message
> templates I have this line:
> %SetHeader("X-Request-PGP","https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=golovniov%40interia.pl";)%-
> When I get the message,
Hello Nestor,
Monday, August 9, 2004, 1:57:29 PM, you wrote:
NF> I'm using The Bat! version 2.12 beta/7 in evaluation mode and
NF> discovered 2 issues that may be bugs:
You are using a very old beta. Try getting the new one, or install the
official 2.12 release (it's newer than that beta).
--
Hi,
I'm using The Bat! version 2.12 beta/7 in evaluation mode and discovered 2
issues that may be bugs:
1) if you create an account without saying during the creation steps that it
will use authenticated SMTP, you won't be able to enable this feature
afterwards. You can set the checkbox in Acco
Hi Chris,
On Tuesday, August 3, 2004 19:38 our local time, Chris Weaven [CW]
wrote;
CW>> I'm currently using TB! 2.12.03 with the Kaspersky 4.5 Pro as my AV.
CW>> Every now and again, the plug-in errors, so I have to remove the plug-in
CW>> and then add it again!? Don't ask me why, but 9 times ou
Hi,
on Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:59:28 +0200GMT I wrote:
PM> Gerard's message threads correctly here, as do all the others of his.
PM> The In-Reply-To header doesn't seem to be needed when the references
PM> are there. hmm
It even does on my lady's laptop, as I could just verify, while I
prepare it for
Hi Roelof and list,
On Monday, August 9, 2004 at 21:15:20 GMT +0200 (which was 21:15 where
I live) Roelof Otten wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable
points on the subject of "Messages lacking In-Reply-To: header and not
threading":
> Is that on IMAP or POP?
On my end the threading i
Hallo Alexander,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 17:15:44 +0200GMT (9-8-2004, 17:15 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread. HA! :-)
So am I and here they threaf.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/4
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Serv
Hallo Kevin,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:37:15 -0700GMT (9-8-2004, 19:37 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
KA> I'm not so sure. I can go back and look at various messages that I
KA> have received that did not thread (Gerard isn't the only instance) and
KA> in all cases, the In-Reply-To header is missing
Hello!
I have a little problem with my headers. In the message templates I
have this line:
%SetHeader("X-Request-PGP","https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=golovniov%40interia.pl";)%-
When I get the message, however, I see the header changed to:
https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=golov
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote:
> Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
> Anybody else?
Yes. That one lacked both In-Reply-To and Reference headers.
--
Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user]
The Bat! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/3 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
. And the only thing the B
ON Monday, August 9, 2004, 4:38:01 AM, you wrote:
P> I notice that Gerard is using X-Ray. Could it be eating the
P> "In-Reply_to:" header?
Yes that is wat it is. I also create a X-ray header so I check that Xray
is working. It is not something Xray will do without being told so.
If this is cre
Hi Zonnet
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:34:16 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:34 AM where
I live) you wrote:
> Hi Allie,
> The answer is Xray. I remove everything that is not strictly needed. I am
> slightly paranoid. I left the msg id in and TB uses that to
Hi Peter Meyns
-
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 18:59:28 [GMT +0200] (which was 9:59 AM where I
live) you wrote:
> Gerard's message threads correctly here, as do all the others of his.
> The In-Reply-To header doesn't seem to be needed when the references
> ar
ON Sunday, August 8, 2004, 8:31:18 PM, you wrote:
AM> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM> the message that you're replying to.
AM> I wonder where that header is disappearing to?
AM> Are
Hello TBUDL,
on Mon, 9. Aug 2004 at 16:37:44 +0300 Robert Golovniov wrote:
> Can I create a filter that would automatically extract this portion of
> the header (in this case, CDCC10F2), make it into the 0xCDCC10F2
> format, put this into the message subject and then send the message to
> the res
Hello Jan Rifkinson,
08-Aug-2004 20:29, you wrote:
> Hi Pete. I assume all msgs have been read.
Ungh, now this one doesn't thread at my end! :-/
Anybody else?
--
Best regards,
Alexander
I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as
equals. -- Winston Churchill
__
Hi Allie,
on Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:31:18 -0500GMT, you wrote:
AM> I've noted that your messages are not threading. Upon checking, they
AM> seem to lack the In-Reply-To: header which should contain the id of
AM> the message that you're replying to.
Gerard's message threads correctly here, as do all
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> OIC. Just looked at the first message were you reported broken threading,
> and in that signature I saw 2.13...
Yes. I use v2.13 beta/3 at home and I use v2.12.00 at work. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- :acm:
List Moderator and fellow end-user
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
R
Hi Alexander and list,
On Monday, August 9, 2004 at 17:15:44 GMT +0200 (which was 17:15 where
I live) Alexander S. Kunz wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of "Messages lacking In-Reply-To:
header and not threading (Was:Re: Harvest Sender Email Addresses??)":
Hello Allie Martin,
09-Aug-2004 17:56, you wrote:
>> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages do not thread.
>> HA! :-)
> I thought you were on to something but I'm now here at work, using
> v2.12.00, and Gerard's messages are still not threading.
OIC. Just looked at the first messag
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> They thread fine here. May it be an IMAP thing, not recognising the
> References header?
TB! downloads from the IMAP server what it needs, saves it to a cache
file and then uses it. IOW's, it's TB! that does the threading. Even
after viewing and reading the messages whic
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using
> version 2.12.00 of TB, and those who report threadings works just
> fine are using, as far as the information is availabe, the 2.12.xx
> version ,too.
> You and Allie are using 2.13beta - and the messages d
Hello DanG & everyone,
08-Aug-2004 19:39, you wrote:
> I use Nod (which I recommend highly)
NOD32 is fast, but it is not a very secure virus scanner. There are a
number of test with similar results for NOD32. For example
http://forums.spywareinfo.com/index.php?showtopic=6165
(sorry for OT but I
Hello Kevin Amazon,
09-Aug-2004 00:53, you wrote:
> Strangely enough, I see the reference headers in Gerard's message but not
> In-Reply-To header and his messages do not thread on my system either.
Those messages do thread fine here at my end, too. I am using version
2.12.00 of TB, and those wh
Hello!
I am still trying to figure out how to teach GnuPG to retrive unknown
PGP keys from the public keyserver working with the mailto protocol.
When I get a message signed with unknown key, my GPGrelay inserts a
respective header (X-GPGrelay-Status), which would contain a line of
G'day all.
One of our fellow list members kindly provided me with the below setup.
What it outputs currently is the following:
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, at 19:17:07 [GMT+0800] (which was 21:17:07 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
What I'd like it to give me is:
At 21:17 [GMT+1000] on Monday A
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 20:02:58 -0500 GMT (09/08/2004, 08:02 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> Odd that for some there's successful threading using the only the
AM> Reference: header information, while with others, the threading fails.
AM>
They thread fine here. May it be an IMAP thi
38 matches
Mail list logo
