spamalot

Battyfolk, I'm finding that the TB! spam plug-in is pretty useless as I don't see any improved spam filtering over many weeks & many msgs. Maybe I'm doing something wrong or there's something I need to check. Anyone experiencing the same &, if so, what are you doing about it? Thanks. -- Jan Rif

Re: spamalot

Jan, On 10-06-2005 14:49, you [JR] wrote in : JR> Anyone experiencing the same &, if so, what are you doing about it? I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far worse at correctly marking spam than my setup at home: SpamPal (with white/blacklists, private and public

Re: spamalot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:00:22 +0200 (9:00 AM here), Peter Fjelsten [PF] wrote in : JR>> Anyone experiencing the same &, if so, what are you doing about JR>> it? PF> I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far w

Re[2]: spamalot

PF>> I am using BayesIt here at work and it is far, far worse at PF>> correctly marking spam than my setup at home: SpamPal (with PF>> white/blacklists, private and public) with the Bayesian and P2P PF>> plugins. This combination is probably running at over 99,5% PF>> success rate. Continuously.

Re: spamalot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Goos, On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:23:00 +0200 (9:23 AM here), Goos [G] wrote in : KC>> Periodically I retry BayesIt and Bayes Filter, as a plug-in would KC>> be simpler. I always go back to SpamPal as it catches almost KC>> every

Re[2]: spamalot

Hello Kevin, Friday, June 10, 2005, 3:00:00 PM, you wrote: KC> - From the messages posted here, both recently and in the past, I think KC> its safe to conclude that 3rd party relay type solutions seem to offer KC> better performance than the plug-ins. For those with a spam problem, KC> its probab

Re: spamalot

Hello Philip, Friday, June 10, 2005, 7:51:48 PM, you wrote: PS> I find it odd that you think because a few people have problems the PS> system is flawed. Every relay/3rd party solution no doubt has a PS> mailing list or forum, on which practically every user has a problem - PS> or they wouldn't

Re: TheBat on Mac? Tips please...

Hi all! Thank you for your replies. OK, the default email client seems good and has gotten your aproval, but do I guess right if I say that I won't be able to check my mail on the server any more? Now, _that's_ a fantastic feature in TheBat, I just hit Alt+2, my chosen accounts get checked, ea

Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

Hello again! Seing the post "Moving the Bat! data files to another computer" I've just realized that this must be the best place to wonder about the same thing - but now from my PC to a Mac. I suppose that I'll need to export each of the main folders like inbox, sent mail and some of the

Re: Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

Hello Dragan, Friday, June 10, 2005, 8:52:45 PM, you wrote: DMR> When moving mail, and this is where this idea came up - one way DMR> could be that I export from TheBat DMR> mail to Outlook first and then use Outlook2Mail to move _everything_. Don't know if this can help you: http://www.aid4mai

Re: spamalot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Philip, On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:51:48 +0100 (1:51 PM here), Philip Storry [PS] wrote in : KC>> I think its safe to conclude that 3rd party relay type KC>> solutions seem to offer better performance than the plug-ins

Re: Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

On Friday, June 10, 2005, 20:52:45, Dragan "Mac" Ruzic wrote: > Now, selecting "Inbox" and going to "Tools/Export..." I've got three > choices, which one to chose? Unix Mailbox - it's a standard format that almost all mail software supports. -- < Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http://deepthought.

Re[2]: spamalot

Hello Kevin, On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 15:15:36 GMT -0400 (which was 21:15:36 where I live), Kevin Coates wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "spamalot": > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hi Philip, > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:51:48 +0100 (1:51 PM here), Phil

Mod: Cut mark (was: TheBat on Mac? Tips please...)

Hallo Dragan, On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:45:44 +0200GMT (10-6-2005, 20:45 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DR> Best regards, DR> Homesick Mac (... getting a Mac, my friends are already making fun of this :-) ) DR> DR> Current version is 3.5.25 |

Re: spamalot

Hello Dick, On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 10:44:52 PM Dick [DH] wrote: DH> Yesterday, I saw an article in a Dutch magazine about a brand new DH> Dutch anti-spam program [...] DH> If you want to know how the program is performing its task, have a look here: DH> http://www.spamexperts.com/EN/tech_ex

Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

Hi Bat! Fans, Sorry to rehash this one, but just can't seem to get it right! How do I get rid of blank lines in macros? For instance, see blank line above "Hi Bat! Fans". The macro I use is %FROM="John Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" %TO=""%TO="TBUDL@thebat.dutaint.com"%- %CC=""%CC=""%- Hi Bat

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

Dear John, @11-Jun-2005, 08:18 +1000 (10-Jun 23:18 UK time) John Phillips [JP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JP> How do I get rid of blank lines in macros? With %- JP> For instance, see blank line above "Hi Bat! Fans". JP> The macro I use is JP> %FROM="John Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" JP>