ssl

2005-12-08 Thread Lou Yovin
I am trying to use SSL for my email. Because my provider's certificate does not match my email address (I don't have my own certificate), thebat will not send/receive with SSL. I get an error message stating the mismatch. In most other email clients, you get a dialog allowing you to

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: ssl)

2005-12-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Lou, On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:14:26 -0500GMT (6-12-2005, 13:14 +0200, where I live), you wrote: L I am trying L not match my L send/receive L other email L anyway. I can L than advice t moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person

Re: ssl

2005-12-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Lou, On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:14:26 -0500GMT (6-12-2005, 13:14 +0100, where I live), you wrote: L I am trying to use SSL for my email. Because my provider's certificate does L not match my email address (I don't have my own certificate), thebat will not L send/receive with SSL. I get

Re: Shift+Delete really deletes

2005-12-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:38:10 +0100 GMT (08/12/2005, 14:38 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: RW Qhatever it is I've now learnt that all TB! RW messages are still available, whatever deletion method is used, thanks RW to you and Roelof. You're qelcome. -- Cheers, Thomas. Kommt

Re: ssl

2005-12-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:35:27 +0100 GMT (08/12/2005, 19:35 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: L I am trying to use SSL for my email. [...] In most other email L clients, you get a dialog allowing you to accept the certificate L anyway. I can't find a setting to allow this. Can anyone

Re: ssl

2005-12-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Thomas, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 20:48:04 +0700GMT (8-12-2005, 14:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote: TF TB has certainly lost his appeal to non-geeks. Well, this was about wanting to use a SSL certificate for a wrong domain. That has nothing to do with geeky-ness. TB doesn't allow that,

Re: Shift+Delete really deletes

2005-12-08 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF Qhatever Now why didn't that get picked up by the spoil chicken when I was writing it? -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.63.08 (Beta) with SpamPal POP3 account and no Plug-ins | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1

Re: ssl

2005-12-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Roelof, On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:06:27 +0100 GMT (08/12/2005, 21:06 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: RO When you really want to do that, you've got to fool TB, but that makes RO sure that you realize what you're doing. That's not like some other RO clients that say: Sure, go ahead, it's a

Re: Automatically backing up The Bat! using bat ch files ·

2005-12-08 Thread Cory
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:32 +0100, Mica Mijatovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... archives on a CD-RW, after a pretty short while (perhaps 2 or 3 weeks) they will (almost all of them) become unreadable/corrupted, and irrecoverable. Media quality, (direct sun-) light conditions, temperature all

Re: Automatically backing up The Bat! using bat ch files ·

2005-12-08 Thread Chris
Cory @ 12/08/2005 8:53:49 AM Automatically backing up The Bat! using batch files · mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I tend to write CD-RW only 2x It has been explained to me that at lower burn speeds, any errors that occur when burning (some always do) affect small portions of the disk, so there is much