On Sun 4-Feb-07 10:38pm -0600, Roger Phillips wrote:
Monday, February 5, 2007, 4:10:31 AM, among other things, you wrote:
BM BTW, I haven't received any mail from TBUDL or TBBeta in
BM 2007 - some glitch in the mailing lists has apparently
BM unsubscribed me.
BM
BM Am I up-to-date (see below my
Hello Bill,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:10:31 -0600 GMT (05/02/2007, 09:10 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Does The Bat! use raw or cooked keyboard input to handle
BM things like Alt-Ctrl?
I tried to google for raw or cooked keyboard input but only got
stuff I didn't understand. OK, different
Hello Bill,
Monday, February 5, 2007, 10:23:44 AM, among other things, you wrote:
BM Thank you Roger. My question wasn't very clear - in that I
BM know I have the latest release (I checked the web site) but
BM was wondering about a new beta.
Your signature shows that you are using 3.95.6 --
On Mon 5-Feb-07 8:21am -0600, Roger Phillips wrote:
Monday, February 5, 2007, 10:23:44 AM, among other things, you wrote:
BM Thank you Roger. My question wasn't very clear - in that I
BM know I have the latest release (I checked the web site) but
BM was wondering about a new beta.
Your
On Mon 5-Feb-07 7:32am -0600, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:10:31 -0600 GMT (05/02/2007, 09:10 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM Does The Bat! use raw or cooked keyboard input to handle
BM things like Alt-Ctrl?
I tried to google for raw or cooked keyboard input but only got
On Monday, February 5, 2007, 21:00:33, Bill McCarthy wrote:
This is why I asked if The Bat! used raw or cooked keyboard
handling. I am hoping that it uses cooked with APIs that
can handle all combinations with Alt, Ctrl and Shift. Maybe
that's not possible - I don't know.
I'd imagine The
Hello Bill,
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:00:33 -0600 GMT (06/02/2007, 03:00 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote.
[...]
Thanks for your explanation.
BM As the Vim user mentioned, the cooked keyboard handling uses
BM an addition software layer - a higher level API call. The
BM higher the level, the lower
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:14:13 -0700, Mike Greenbaum wrote:
It's true that with your method sorting in the address book is done by last
name, but the names are still shown in the address book with first name first.
I can live with this if necessary, but ideally--and I suggest this for some
8 matches
Mail list logo
