Re: two Bats running?

2007-09-01 Thread Fredrik Bergström
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 20:47:13 -0400 GMT, Peter wrote: > The Bat appears to be running OK, but when I open the Task Manager I see > two BAT icons running. If I "End Task" both icons disappear. > I did check, that by any chance I am running 2 Bats, but could not locate > it. > I wonder if anyone run

Re: two Bats running?

2007-09-01 Thread Christopher W .
Peter Kerekes @ 2007-9-01 7:47:13 PM "two Bats running?" > The Bat appears to be running OK, but when I open the Task Manager I > see two BAT icons running. If I "End Task" both icons disappear. > I did check, that by any chance I am running 2 Bats, but could not locate > it. Had one, perhaps,

two Bats running?

2007-09-01 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello, The Bat appears to be running OK, but when I open the Task Manager I see two BAT icons running. If I "End Task" both icons disappear. I did check, that by any chance I am running 2 Bats, but could not locate it. I wonder if anyone run into that, and how did it correct. Than you --

Re: List Archives

2007-09-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Lonewolf, @2-Sep-2007, 07:43 +1000 (01-Sep 22:43 here) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [L] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bat!: L> Fellow Bat! Fans. L> Can someone point me to these please? http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/ L> Thought this was available in the headers, but I can't

List Archives

2007-09-01 Thread lonewolf
Fellow Bat! Fans. Can someone point me to these please? Thought this was available in the headers, but I can't seem to find it. T.I.A. -- Regards, John Phillips Sydney, Australia Using Bat! 3.99.24, Windows XP, 2600, Service Pack 2 Dell Precision M70 Laptop, 1 Gig ram. _

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread lonewolf
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, at 20:30:42 [GMT +1000] (20:30:42 01/09/2007 Australian Eastern Time) I wrote: > After setting Bat! to associate with EML files in Explorer, go to the > advanced > tab, and make sure "open" (without the ") is there. > YMMV, and mine as well! Hey, I spoke too early! Issue h

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Sat, 2007-09-01, Mark Partous wrote: >>> Thanks, the problem has come back - not Outlook but Outofluck Express >>> seems to keep grabbing it. JH>> In the Control Panel is 'Internet Options'. That has the tab 'Programs'. JH>> Go there and look what's set as email program. I bet it's Outbook Pe

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread lonewolf
Jurgen, On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, at 11:07:12 [GMT +0200] (19:07:12 01/09/2007 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > well I had that problem at work, and it was fixed after setting the Mail > Program to > TB! I then had to set it in TB again the next day, but never again. So > there's still > hope fo

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Jurgen, Saturday, September 1, 2007, 7:41:09 AM, you wrote: >> Thanks, the problem has come back - not Outlook but Outofluck Express >> seems to keep grabbing it. JH> In the Control Panel is 'Internet Options'. That has the tab 'Programs'. JH> Go there and look what's set as email program

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread lonewolf
Jurgen, On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, at 07:41:09 [GMT +0200] (15:41:09 01/09/2007 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: > In the Control Panel is 'Internet Options'. That has the tab 'Programs'. Go > there > and look what's set as email program. I bet it's Outbook Perplex. Bat! is there but Forte Agent f

RE: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Bob, Saturday, September 1, 2007, 9:44:24 AM, you wrote: >>> Thanks, the problem has come back - not Outlook but Outofluck Express >>> seems to keep grabbing it. >> In the Control Panel is 'Internet Options'. That has the tab >> 'Programs'. Go there and look what's set as email program. I

Re: .EML associations don't remain "sticky"

2007-09-01 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jurgen, Saturday, September 1, 2007, 3:41:09 PM, you wrote: > Hello lonewolf, > Thursday, August 30, 2007, 5:33:26 AM, you wrote: >> Bob, >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, at 08:56:02 [GMT +1000] (08:56:02 30/08/2007 >> Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: >>> If you happen to have MS Outlook ins