Hello MFPA,
I may be wrong because I use a different set of folder icons
(yellowish) but, from what I see, what you say are 'common' folders
look as accounts to me.
Just adding my 2p worth. I use the default icon set and here an
account and a common folder look identical in the account tree
Hello Richard,
M Can you right click on any of them, look at Properties and confirm
M if they are Common folders or Accounts?
Common Folders Preferences is what comes up.
OK, so they are common folders.
M In one of your messages you say: But I'm left with three empty 'common'
M folders
Hello MFPA,
I may be wrong because I use a different set of folder icons
(yellowish) but, from what I see, what you say are 'common' folders
look as accounts to me.
Just adding my 2p worth. I use the default icon set and here an
account and a common folder look identical in the account tree
Hi Everyone,
I have been using TB 4 for IMAP with my Gmail account. So far (since
mid-July), I think TB has done well with Gmail's IMAP. I have a
question about an IMAP account setting, however.
One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
this, When inactive, disconnect
Bob,
On 10-09-2008 19:12, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
this, When inactive, disconnect after (X) seconds. Is it better to
check that or to not check it when one has an always-on DSL
connection?
I'd not check it.
Hi Peter from the Danish Peninsula, home of the late Victor Borge,
Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 11:37:17 AM, you wrote:
Bob,
On 10-09-2008 19:12, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One of the last Mail Management pane items to be possibly checked is
this, When inactive, disconnect after
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 11:26:38 AM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], MAU wrote:
Independently of icons, accounts are underlined and common folders
aren't. Correct?
Presumably that was introduced since I allocated all my folders to
colour groups with dark backgrounds. At least, I don't
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Riley wrote:
I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system. I think
of IMAP as very handy (convenient) but perhaps using much more
bandwidth than POP. Am I mistaken?
Logic would suggest that IMAP
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:37:17 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fjelsten wrote:
It means that it disconnects from the server if you do not work with
it. On xDSL there should be no reason for this.
Does it have any adverse effect on the server performance if there are
lots of
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 6:49:40 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob Riley wrote:
I was thinking of conserving bandwidth in the whole system.
Further to my previous message, I would imagine being logged on but
not actually doing anything uses very little bandwidth (-;
--
Best
MFPA,
On 10-09-2008 20:20, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It means that it disconnects from the server if you do not work with
it. On xDSL there should be no reason for this.
Does it have any adverse effect on the server performance if there are
lots of people logged on but not active?
Hello MAU,
Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 6:18:10 AM, you wrote:
M Remove AntiSpamSniper plugin and then try to delete the folders.
I did that and the common folders weren't deleted. I could
delete the junk folder and then the three copies reflected in the
common folders disappeared. But,
Hi
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 at 7:45:39 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
I am trying to use the 'Run External Process' action under a TB!
filter, but the command does not do as I would expect.
Never tried it.
I have a TB! folder that all my voicemail messages gets
13 matches
Mail list logo
