Hello MFPA,
Saturday, January 10, 2009, 6:41:37 AM, you wrote:
>> Do a search on QTB and see if finds them...
> Search (including hidden and system) only finds 3 QTB files: the one
> in my Mail ditectory for the common QTs and the ones I'm trying to
> delete in the account directories for the t
Hello MFPA,
>> I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or
>> newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any
>> future messages will not bother me.
>
> How do you achieve that and what does it do?
I use two different ways, one with and 'Ignore' filter and th
Hello MFPA,
>> I have never seen such a behaviour.
>
> Well it has always been the behaviour I have experienced in TB! until
> very recently.
After reading your I think
you should redefine what you mean by 'always' and 'recently'. ;-)
>> I think you are complicating things here with colour gro
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:51:50 PM, in
, Marek Mikus wrote:
> account.qtn is old format used for storing QTs, qtb is
> a new one.
That was it! I deleted the QTN files as well as the QTB files and they
stay gone. So it was the QTN files that kept making the QTN files
reappear.
--
Be
Hello all,
Saturday, January 10, 2009, MFPA wrote:
>> Do a search on QTB and see if finds them...
> Search (including hidden and system) only finds 3 QTB files: the one
> in my Mail ditectory for the common QTs and the ones I'm trying to
> delete in the account directories for the two accounts th
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 1:50:21 AM, in
, tracer wrote:
> Hello MFPA,
> Friday, January 9, 2009, 7:29:38 AM, you wrote:
>> Hi
>> On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:04 PM, in
>> , Ian A.
>> White wrote:
>>> I just checked my account folders and they QTB files
>>> I deleted have not be
Hello all,
Friday, January 9, 2009, Jason Gottschalk wrote:
> Which Account.* file keeps track of the folders and subfolder? I'd
> like to try deleting it and seeing if it will rebuild and find all of my
> folders.
files ACCOUNT.FLB and ACCOUNT.~FLB
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The
Hallo Jason,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:12:26 -0500GMT (9-1-2009, 23:12 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JG> Which Account.* file keeps track of the folders and subfolder?
JG> I'd like to try deleting it and seeing if it will rebuild and find all of
my folders.
account.flb
Be careful with your exp
Hello Tbudl,
Which Account.* file keeps track of the folders and subfolder? I'd like to
try deleting it and seeing if it will rebuild and find all of my folders.
--
Best Regards
Jason Gottschalk
ja...@syo.com
SYO Computer Services and SYO Biometrics
ph:586-286-2557
fx:586-286-1198
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 12:48:00 AM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> I think this changed when I upgraded from v4.0.32.4 to
> v4.0.38 but it may have been a slightly earlier
> upgrade.
It was indeed a "slightly" earlier upgrade (-;
I have just tested with some old versions and found the behaviour I
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 1:39:58 AM, in
, Rick wrote:
> Are we perhaps talking about in a collapsed tree
> branch? If so then I never noticed. It would have to
> highlight to let you know there was an unread message
> in the branch (?)
No we are not, although a collapsed branch is still
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 8:44:05 AM, in
, Jens Franik wrote:
> Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote:
>> If not read but just marked as read they are red not
>> bold.
> How do you manage to do that? I thought "read" as
> opened is the same as "read" by CTRL-M.
I usually read
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:58:33 AM, in
, Jens Franik wrote:
> maybe a colorgroup stands for "read that later", or something we
> will never guess without explanation, so let us drink some coffe
> first...
> :batcoffee:
Aw! I missed the coffee.
It has grown to mean something like "di
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:49:56 AM, in
, MAU wrote:
> I don't actually read everything I get from mailing lists or
> newsgroups. I even 'Ignore' complete threads or branches so that any
> future messages will not bother me.
How do you achieve that and what does it do?
> I may be wron
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 11:29:35 AM, in
, Jens Franik wrote:
> Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote:
>> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you
>> have NOT read?
> I do this too, because i look over the subjects
> and if it is a Flame-War i do not read
Hi
On Friday 9 January 2009 at 10:45:44 AM, in
, MAU wrote:
> I have never seen such a behaviour.
Well it has always been the behaviour I have experienced in TB! until
very recently.
> The default behaviour, which has always (or AFAIR) been like that,
> is that an 'unread' (not marked as 'read
Hello Jernej,
Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 7:32:28 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
> If you're the server admin, you have to replace the certificate on the
> server. Otherwise, you need to notify the server administrator to do
> it.
Thanks for the reply. That's what I did eventually. The admin was bus
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 12:49, MAU wrote:
>>> If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold.
>>
>> This is a key issue I think. Why and how do you 'mark as read' a
>> message that you have NOT read?
> I may be wrong but I think MFPA is trying to make a distinction between
> messag
Hello Jens,
>> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read?
>
> I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a
> Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and
> CTRL-M it all read without reading it.
Of course, we all do that
JSL>> A long time ago there was a thread on the dangers of leaving messages
JSL>> in the inbox. Unfortunately I no longer remember exactly what the
JSL>> danger was. I searched the archives for the subject line above but
JSL>> found nothing explaining the problem. Does anybody remember?
RO> Basical
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 11:45, MAU wrote:
> Why and how do you 'mark as read' a message that you have NOT read?
I do this too, because i look over the subjects and if it is a
Flame-War i do not read the Messages, i will mark the Folder and
CTRL-M it all read without reading it.
Hello MFPA,
> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
> the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
> didn't change.
I have never seen such a behaviour. The default behaviour, which has
always (or AFAIR) been like that, is that an 'unread' (
Freitag, 9. Januar 2009 at 01:48, MFPA wrote:
> If not read but just marked as read they are red not bold.
How do you manage to do that? I thought "read" as opened is the same
as "read" by CTRL-M.
--
With kind Regards
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.d
23 matches
Mail list logo
