Sunday, July 26, 2009, 11:57:44 PM, you wrote:
> Hallo Tom,
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:29:32 +1000GMT (26-7-2009, 10:29 +0200, where
> I live), you wrote:
T>> This worked well for a while. I am not sure what changed or what I
T>> might have changed but currently the filter only works to place the
Hi
On Sunday 26 July 2009 at 11:45:14 PM, in
, Simon wrote:
> I'll remember to tell the altruist that gives up their
> free time and money that they should desist with their
> beneficent activities because they should be paid for
> their troubles, because they are the rules, and
> fairness deman
Hello Simon,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:45:14 +0100 GMT (27/Jul/09, 5:45 AM +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
P>>> I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.
>> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old tradition.
>> I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
S> "Let p
'Ello Thomas,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:49:21 +0700 (your time) you said:
P>> I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.
> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old tradition.
> I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
"Let people..." is a curious turn of p
> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old
> tradition. I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
I pay for a spamcop.net account because reporting spammers may not
stop them, but it helps dry up their sending sources. I may be
shoveling against the tide but I feel that
Hello Privateofcourse,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:22:48 +0100 GMT (15/Jun/09, 21:22 +0700 GMT),
Privateofcourse wrote:
P> I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority
P> of so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't
P> really do anything other than allow you to
Hallo Carren,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:18:07 +1200GMT (26-7-2009, 9:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty
CS> well, but is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my
other filters have run?
No there isn't. plug-
Hi
On Sunday 26 July 2009 at 8:45:29 AM, in
, Carren Stuart wrote:
> I'm trying to get my head around how Address Book Group
> templates work as opposed to folder templates. Not
> quite sure what the advantage of one is over the other
> yet.
A Folder template will be used if that folder has fo
Hallo Carren,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:45:29 +1200GMT (26-7-2009, 9:45 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> I'm trying to get my head around how Address Book Group templates
CS> work as opposed to folder templates. Not quite sure what the
CS> advantage of one is over the other yet.
Address book
Hallo Tom,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:29:32 +1000GMT (26-7-2009, 10:29 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
T> This worked well for a while. I am not sure what changed or what I
T> might have changed but currently the filter only works to place the
T> relevant email into the outbox but does not send the
Hello Carren,
Sunday, July 26, 2009, 9:18:07 AM, among other things, you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but
CS> is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other
CS> filters have run?
I don't think so.
CS> In spite of me atte
Hello Everyone,
I set up a filter on one of my accounts to redirect incoming mail to
another external account provided certain criteria are met.
This worked well for a while. I am not sure what changed or what I
might have changed but currently the filter only works to place the
relevant email in
Hello
I'm trying to get my head around how Address Book Group templates work as
opposed to folder templates. Not quite sure what the advantage of one is over
the other yet.
I note that the "To" field automaticaly fills with TBUDL for a new
message. Sending this message to see if it works.
-
Hi
I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but is
there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other filters
have run? In spite of me attempting to train it to recognise TBDUL mail as "not
junk" - much of my list mail is still ending up in the junk
14 matches
Mail list logo
