Re[7]: RTF

Bonjour Barry2, Le mercredi 30 octobre 2002 à 20:17:47, vous écriviez : B> Hello François, B> I understand your point, but it's the HTML code that activates the B> javascript / ActiveX etc etc ... and that's where the insecurity lies. No, it is not the HTML code that activates the javascrip /

Re[5]: RTF

Bonjour Barry2, B> HTML has been proven over and over to be inherently insecure so who's to say that an B> exploit couldn't be found to attack TB! through HTML ?? There is a big misunderstanding about HTML and security. HTML can *NOT* be insecure. HTML is a set of hierarchicaly ordered tags. Thes

Re[2]: RTF

Bonjour Roelof, Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez : RO> Hallo François, RO> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where RO> I live), you wrote: FP>> * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching FP>> to XML RO> Why are you both ba

Re[2]: RTF

Bonjour Roelof, Le mardi 29 octobre 2002 à 22:58:47, vous écriviez : RO> Hallo François, RO> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:14:19 +0100GMT (29-10-02, 22:14 +0100GMT, where RO> I live), you wrote: FP>> * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching FP>> to XML RO> Why are you both ba

Re[2]: RTF

Bonjour Jonathan, May I enter this thread just to mention that : * HTML is not primarily a cosmetic format, but a semantic format : it is a subset of XML and thus carry inherent qualities that goes far above rtf. * rtf itself is a thing of the past, since M$ itself is switching to XML * to please

Re[2]: Outlook import

Bonjour Paul, PC> I can confirm that importing messages from OL IS a problem. Have you tried the freeware called "Dawn" (currently in version 5.0) ? It is designed to translate e-mails from a format to another. Tried it myself in another context (Netscape to Pegassus as far as I remember) and w

Re[2]: Images

Bonjour, Thanks to Andre and Roelof for their quick answer. This mailling list is amazing ! I understand this is a feature, but I would just suggest that this feature is, in next version of TB, left to the user decision. In my point of view an hyperlink to a gif, a jpeg or a png image is not a s

Images

Bonjour, I have been using The Bat for more than one year and took for granted that TB was unable to display images which are not included as part of a multipart MIME message but only through a link to their place on the web. But I recently questionned this assumption