y one feature of "the bat" that is significantly better than
Eudora light: automatic recognition of embedded UUENCODED files. Otherwise, there are
too many problems (unless you all have fixes to the above list ... all discovered in
an hour's worth of use ... what ot
There are a
bunch of little quirks, but mostly stuff I can live with. Because E-mail is critical
to my business, I can't live with a buggy, hard-to-use problem like The Bat. Since I
paid for The Bat, I'll probably keep it around to get at those occassional uuencoded
files that Eudora doe
At 16:34 1999-12-25 +0700, tracer wrote:
> Hello Frank Farance,
> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:06:54 -0500 GMT your local time,
> which was Friday, December 24, 1999, 11:06:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
> Frank Farance wrote:
>
> Frank> The Bat somehow corrupts the registry when
At 23:07 1999-12-25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
> about "Re: Other windows crashes":
>
> > > Also, you post this on Eudora and you still got that damn line length
> > > set wron
At 16:29 1999-12-25 -0500, Frank Farance wrote:
> At 23:07 1999-12-25 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > On 25 Dec 99, at 12:01, Frank Farance wrote
> > about "Re: Other windows crashes":
> >
> > > > Also, you post
At 01:42 1999-12-26 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On 25 Dec 99, at 16:40, Frank Farance wrote
> about "Regarding the RFCs":
>
> The headers of *this* your message:
>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I just checked my E-mail as it lea
his type of preference in future releases.
Both conventions are useful. I happen to use very-long-lines for text, and properly
wrapped lines for code.
-FF
---
Frank Farance, Farance Inc. T: +1 212 486 4700
ines, which are described by RFC 821.
Please re-read my E-mails and you'll see that I've been referring to RFC 2045 and
*logical* lines ... not RFC 822 (as you had suggested the E-mails violate, which they
don't) and not RFC 821 (because I've referred to "logical" lines)
2 because
>Alexander said that long lines violated RFC 822. In one of my prior messages, I
>suggested that the focus is really RFC 2045.
It's really the *display* issue in The Bat. No one is forced to re-wrap ... only
users of The Bat need to re-wrap.
-FF
---
t leaves your SMTP, it
> will *never* become one whatever server it passes...
That's not true. Some of the SMTP servers convert to/from quoted printable, so it is
possible that message headers get changed, added, or deleted ... sendmail 8.9.x does
this.
-FF
--
I think I've gotten all the help I can on The Bat ... so I'm unsubscribing.
Hope you all have a Happy Holiday and New Year.
Good luck on The Bat!
-FF
-------
Frank Farance, Farance Inc. T: +1 212 486 4700 F: +1 21
11 matches
Mail list logo
