Re: Exporting messagebase to Mozilla Thunderbird?

2005-06-20 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Roleof, On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 11:54 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I was messing about with Thunderbird and tried importing a few messages so I could play around but cannot get them in a format that Thunderbird can import - anyone any ideas? I'd guess unix mailbox would work.

Re: Re[3]: opening HTML files error

2005-06-16 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Marten, -- 16.06.2005 11:03 +0100: So there we have it - comment on a problem on the TBUDL list and you get an instant cure! ...if only that worked for all the probs! :D Perhaps you may want try the experiment with tbot or tbbeta the next time. They too should have mysterious

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

2005-06-08 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi MFPA, -- 08.06.2005 10:59 +0100: Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. Or even, that _line_. I thought of _h_int. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is

Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?

2005-06-03 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Anthony, -- 03.06.2005 10:24 +0200: Select the message header only in a folder, then press F9 to see the raw text, and see if it lets you copy. It seems to be related to that. I can do whatever I want - everything is fine. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?

2005-06-02 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Anthony, -- 03.06.2005 07:22 +0200: Why is the Copy option disabled when I look at the raw text of a message with the F9 key? Hmm, I don't have any problems. F9 - View Message Source - Right-Click context menu - Copy Don't you see this menu? -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de

Re: Why can't I copy the raw text of a message?

2005-06-02 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Anthony, -- 03.06.2005 07:40 +0200: For example, on your reply to this list, the copy is enabled, but in my message to this list, it's disabled. Not for me, that's strange! Sorry, I never heard of any problems concerning copying a text in the message source viewer. What's with the

Re: folder corrupted, repaired but msgs missing?!

2005-05-30 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi MAU, -- 30.05.2005 20:30 +0200: This PART0001.BIN seems to hold the messages in plain text format, but how can/should I further work with this file to recover as much content as possible? I don't know of any more or less automatic way of recovering the messages from t he BIN file.

Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!

2005-05-24 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Martin, -- 24.05.2005 08:58 +0100: If only women came with pulldown menus and online help. ...and a reset button. ;-) I thought they do have buttons. ... nice day to you all. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version

Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!

2005-05-23 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 23.05.2005 18:53 +0200: I just created an IMAP account in TB Nice middle name. ;) Threading seems okay. -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!

2005-05-23 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Alexander, -- 23.05.2005 19:07 +0200: and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-) Long before Tony in trial period. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current

Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!

2005-05-23 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 23.05.2005 18:52 +0100: Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway. Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way. --

Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!

2005-05-23 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, -- 23.05.2005 18:56 +0100: Threading seems okay. Your not listening to me are you? I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question. I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does

Re: Theory test.

2005-05-20 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Tony, just now (on 05/20/2005 at 18:30) you meant: Would appreciate a PGP verification report from as many people as possible. If my theory proves correct this should validate on TBUDL but not TBOT You got, Tony. Theory isn't bad, but not perfect. See: ,- | gpg: Signature made 05/20/05

Re: Proposal for spam filters

2005-05-19 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Tony, -- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 09:32) you noticed: In that case may I suggest http://www.firetrust.com/ BAD Sig! -- just now (on 05/19/2005 at 10:17) you wrote: Exactly what I said, add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the white list if that's the sender. BAD Sig! -- just now (on

Re: Undelete? Used for...?

2005-05-18 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hi Stefan, just now (on 05/18/2005 at 01:08) you commented: Does this mean that deleted messages will be visible in the main window and identified by strikeout text? Yes, something like this... Great Stefan! -- Bye, Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP

Re: address book gone?

2005-05-17 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Tony, just now (on 05/17/2005 at 10:24) you dropped the lines: So are you saying in TBUDL my threading is OK and all to cock just in TBBETA? Fire up TB! and see yourself. ;-) -- Bye, Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack