Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-29 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
I'm going to respond to a bunch of e-mails from different people, so in order to avoid sending a bunch of replies I've combined them into this one. Also please read it all, including my previous lengthy post on other software that uses the be lenient in what you receive... policy. Also, I'm

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
Thursday, November 28, 2002, 9:37:47 AM, you wrote: JA I think that is correct behavior per RFCs. Special characters such as JA spaces, , and such are supposed to converted to the hex version. ... JA So TB! is only behaving as per the rules. You'll find it is the other JA mail clients that are

Re: html mailto bug

2002-11-28 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
It's long, I know, I'm sorry :( Friday, November 29, 2002, 12:18:10 AM, you wrote: JA It's almost this kind of thinking (no offence) that starts getting JA programs in trouble. I know mailto: URLs won't cause any halm (unless JA you do permit certain headers to be set), but saying well, just let

html mailto bug

2002-11-27 Thread Nathan J. Yoder
I think I've found a minor, but annoying mailto: bug. With an HTML link that uses the mailto: and a subject line (i.e. a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=hello how are you) The Bat! may not properly insert the subject line into the message composing window. If the subject line contains