Hello Roelof,
On 3 Dec 2003 at 18:34:09 +0100 GMT [18:34 CET] you wrote:
RO> A workaround would be %ABOToName
That works. Thanks alot!
--
Cheers,
Andre
"Let me assure you that to us here at First National,
you're not just a number. You're two numbers,
a dash, three more numbers, another da
Hi Roelof,
@3-Dec-2003, 18:38 +0100 (03-Dec 17:38 UK time) Roelof Otten said to
Marck:
AW>>> and how to fix it?
MDP>> Use %AbOFromName instead.
> Wouldn't that give the name of the original poster, so Andre would
> get something like 'Name on Name ', while he wanted
> something like 'Name on Li
Hallo Marck,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:25:29 +GMT (3-12-03, 18:25 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MDP> Because any changes to the "To" address (including initial
MDP> assignment) are no longer completed until the entire reply template
MDP> is processed in V2.
AW>> and how to fix it?
MDP> Use %
Hallo Andre,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:45:04 +0100GMT (3-12-03, 17:45 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
AW> %To=''%To='%ofromname on %AbToName <%oreplyaddr>'%-
AW> This seems to no longer work in v2. While it should return something
AW> like
AW> So %AbToN
Hi Andre,
@3-Dec-2003, 17:45 +0100 (03-Dec 16:45 UK time) Andre Wichartz [AW]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to tbudl:
AW> So %AbToName does nothing at all. Could someone please explain
AW> why that is
Because any changes to the "To" address (including initial
assignment) are no
Hello all,
I've this line in one of my quicktemplates which is used in my reply
templates:
%To=''%To='%ofromname on %AbToName <%oreplyaddr>'%-
This seems to no longer work in v2. While it should return something
like
Name on tbudl
it instead returns
Name on
6 matches
Mail list logo
