Re[2]: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Marco Qualizza
> ... and (absolutely) last, but by *no* means least [DH]. That one's > reserve for Myself, Curtis and Wolfgang. "Can you see what it is > yet?". > Yes! Dead Horse ! Hrm... I was gambling on "du hast"... as in "You got me there... you must hate me to ask such a tough question". (This is where a

Re: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christian, On 23 October 2000 at 10:23:32 GMT +0200 (which was 09:23 where I live) Christian Gassmann wrote and made these points on the subject of "[OT] Meaningful Subjects": >> Maybe we could introduce a system of prefixe

Re: [OT] Meaningful Subjects

2000-10-23 Thread Christian Gassmann
Jamie Dainton wrote: DH>> OK, I am not a moderator, so this is merely an appeal: could we please DH>> revert to *meaningful* subjects? > Maybe we could introduce a system of prefixes to the subject. Examples > would be: > [GH] = General Help > [TBSC] = TB Slow or Crashing (could set autores