Steve Lee:
> It is Spamcop.net not spamcop.com - big difference.
Yes - spamcop.com is is someone trying to trade on SpamCop.Net's
trademark and reputation. spamcop.com's marketing tactics are down-
right un-sporting. Gotta ask yourself what FirstTrust's deal is in
this...
--
St
_
Hello St - Musaic.Net & everyone else,
on 18-Mai-2005 at 14:11 you (St - Musaic.Net) wrote:
> SpamCop allows you to whitelist Senders, not Recipients.
Its a known fact that many inferior spamfilters have problems dealing with
mailing lists, yes.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurower
Hi Tony,
On 18/05/2005 11:24 AM +0100, you wrote:
> TBOT is a Yahoo group list and I've never seen anything like extra
> subject tags in any subject line? Just the standard subject as typed.
It was specifically administered to do that. Subject prefixing isn't an
imposed feature for all Yahoo g
Hello Tony,
> %SINGLERE in your template will cure that.
Or Account/Properties/Templates/Reply and deselect 'Use reply numbering
in the subject line'.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.5
Current versio
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 13:50 +0100 you wrote about Re[4]: [TBUDL] Proposal for
spam filters:
> Ineterestingly enough this very thread has [TBUDL] at the beginning of the
> subject field.
Only because some poor gullible soul took you too seriously :)
I used to belong to a list th
> TBOT is a Yahoo group list and I've never seen anything like extra subject
> tags in any subject line? Just the standard subject as typed.
It is a configurable option, by default it displays.
Ineterestingly enough this very thread has [TBUDL] at the beginning of the
subject field.
--
Best wi
Alexander S. Kunz:
> But then again, the antispam solution you're using shouldn't catch on
> TBUDlist messages... if it does, it would be interesting to see which
> parameter raises the spam probability level of a list message - and
> correct that error of the spam filter.
SpamCop allow
Hello Tony,
>> That is how Yahoo Groups works and it is very effective.
>
> TBOT is a Yahoo group list and I've never seen anything like extra subject
> tags in any subject line? Just the standard subject as typed.
It is an optional configuration setting in each group/mailing list.
--
Best reg
Steve Lee:
> I use Spamcop for filtering rather than TB or any other local product as
> I find Spamcop usually very accurate with very few false positives but I
> found 24 trapped messages from this group yesterday where I might expect
> to find only 1 or 2 and identifying them so I can whitelis
Hello Steve.
--On 18 May 2005 10:43 +0100 you wrote about Re[2]: [TBUDL] Proposal for
spam filters:
> That is how Yahoo Groups works and it is very effective.
TBOT is a Yahoo group list and I've never seen anything like extra subject
tags in any subject line? Just the standard subject
> Why can't you just sort on list email adresses?!? You can not rely on
> each user to insert a tag - it won't work!
I was not asking each user to insert a tag, I was asking the operator
of the mailing list to do it. That is how Yahoo Groups works and it
is very effective.
I use Spamcop fo
Hello Roman.
--On 17 May 2005 21:26 -0400 you wrote about Re: [TBUDL] Proposal for spam
filters:
> Neat. Can you post it somewhere? With it's source maybe?
Gordon Bennett. Everyone's going to be using it now. Subject lines full of
quirky little anecdotes enclosed in square brack
On Tuesday, May 17, 2005, 19:47:07, St - Musaic.Net wrote:
> I just designed a plug-in for my TB featuring a bunch of *very* useful
> things (ie. a *terrific* anti-spam system). One feture I eventually
> added was one that inserts the "correct" subject tag for any mailing
> list ("TBUDL", "TBBTEA"
> In order to easily identify emails from this group trapped in our spam
> filters can all subject fields please be prefixed with [The Bat!] if
> you have control over the emailer software used?
Why can't you just sort on list email adresses?!? You can not rely on
each user to insert a tag -
14 matches
Mail list logo
