I just wanted to update this mail with 2.00.6:
TB is much faster now (maybe as fast as 1.63).
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
2.00.6
Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.si
Hi Krister
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 2:43:57 AM, you wrote:
KE> I can see where you're coming from and your wish is ok, imho, as long
KE> as functionality is the same. I don't want to miss functionality just
KE> because i can't see to use it, so if we have the same functionality
KE> but diffe
Hello Stan,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:14:21 PM, you wrote:
SR> Has V2 replaced the cockamamie free caret text editor with a
SR> competent auto-wrapping text editor? That would be worth upgrading
SR> for.
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vishal,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2 Sep 2003 19:53:15 (my local time 3 sep 2003 01:53:15), you
typed:
V> Personally, I think a new skin for TB is a great idea. I've often found myself
V> wishing for one. As long as there is a defa
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 10:27:26 PM, you wrote:
> It has added a hamstrung windows editor
Say what?
> to cater for the
> wishes of those who get the hang of a sensible free caret editor
> ;-).
Sonofagun, Marck, I've been trying, I really have, but it just ain't
gonna happen. Ever.
The car
@3-Sep-2003, 04:27 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stan:
MDP> to cater for the wishes of those who
can't
MDP> get the hang of a sensible free caret editor ;-).
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v2.00 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
pgp0
Hi Stan,
@2-Sep-2003, 22:14 -0500 (04:14 UK time) Stan Robins [SR] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marek:
SR> Has V2 replaced the cockamamie free caret text editor with a
SR> competent auto-wrapping text editor? That would be worth
SR> upgrading for.
No. Not replaced. That would be a downgrade
Has V2 replaced the cockamamie free caret text editor with a competent
auto-wrapping text editor? That would be worth upgrading for.
HTML support? The hyper-techies used to consider this a bad thing,
worthy only of the admiration of someone who considers Outlook Express
to be a sophisticated piece
Hi Krister
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 3:05:49 PM, you wrote:
MM> Hello all,
MM> Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MM>>> (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many
>> What do you mean by "customizable interface". Please, oh please don't
>> say you m
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 4:30:22 PM,Jonathan wrote:
JA> And the plugins :)
Oooops I forget the plugins!!! Thanks for the reminder Jonathan
- speaking of which - I was asked yesterday if there is any progress
with the newsreader plugin... does anyone have any info about it's
progress/timescal
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MM>> (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many
> What do you mean by "customizable interface". Please, oh please don't
> say you mean skins, cause if you do, i would like to be informed of
> another MUA, ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marek,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2 Sep 2003 15:35:07 , you typed:
MM> (completely new filtering system, customizable interface etc.). Many
What do you mean by "customizable interface". Please, oh please don't
say you mean skins,
On Tuesday, September 02, 2003, Anne wrote...
> Don't forget that v2 has HTML support which 1.x didn't have ;-) oh
> and the Scheduler!
And the plugins :)
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adolescence - the time between puberty and adultery.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> I must say that although I have been through all the betas (more or
> less) I am a bit disappointed with the features in 2.0. Like someone
> else said, if you don't use IMAP and PGP (which, I guess, most people
> don't), there is n
Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 9:08:41 AM,Peter wrote:
PF> I am a bit disappointed with the features in 2.0. Like someone
PF> else said, if you don't use IMAP and PGP (which, I guess, most people
PF> don't), there is not anything "real" new.
Don't forget that v2 has HTML support which 1.x didn't
TheBat-users,
Since installing 2.0 (coming from 1.63 beta) TB has definitely slowed
down. Moving from one folder/account to another takes noticeably longer
than it did with 1.63. I _have_ purged/compressed, etc.
The same with filter processing and communication with the POP3
mailbox.
Has a
16 matches
Mail list logo
